Well if you say there is "a trait in a group of peoples' character" then you should be called racist. This has nothing to do with being against religions.
Microw
joined 1 year ago
It's like back in the day gifting rout bought newspaper copy to someone else to read
There was a clause in the regulations that led broadcasters to basically be scared of losing their license if they didnt include public-interest content in their programming. Plus news wasnt obligated to make profit by the managers
This is the US, minors posting themselves would also lead to arrests.
(And the actual platform with a reputation for minors selling their nudes would be Snapchat)
The article explains it in one case, an adult woman verified the account and then they posted a minor's videos on it instead.
But the article also said that they only know about 30 cases in 5 years in the US. Which doesn't sound like a huge amount to me personally (still too many obviously)
Yeah.
Diaz set up an account and had a woman verify it as hers. That woman, whom police didn’t identify, later quit OnlyFans. But her account remained live and accessible to Diaz. He filled it with videos of the underage girl
That's really not easy to catch, no matter what platform you are. Some people will do complicated shit to evade the eyes of the law for their illicit activities.
They are known for making a browser that constantly puts them into a financial deficit. Mozilla is still looking for a way to pay their bills in the long run.
Sure. Like @[email protected] or @[email protected] or @[email protected] or @[email protected] or @[email protected] ... and there definitely are more people that I see regularly and simply cant think of their names right now
Yeah, that red circle around Utøya is really sad 😞
My bad. Doesnt change what I mean though: the AI should not say "it's also great to put glue on the pizza" - it should either not reference that at all or say "fucksmith on reddit recommends glue on pizza".
The main field where they are already actively in professuonal use are rough drafts in creative fields: quickly generate possible outlines for a text, a speech, an art piece. Visualize where something could be going, in order to decide which direction to pick.
Also, models that work differently from the GPTs are already in use in science, scanning through huge amounts of texts in archives to help analyzing or search for something in particular. Help find patterns in things for studies. Etc.
The "personal assistant AI" thing obviously isnt quite working yet. I think it will take some time and models with a different technological structure (not GPT) to achieve progress in that regard.
It's not about who you condemn, dude. It's about what exactly you condemn them about. That really shouldnt be such a complicated concept.