Majoof

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

Depends.

They're gps guided 155mm artillery rounds. The electronics and guidance in them reliably survive the 50,000 g-force hell of being shot out of a cannon and then land (when used correctly) within a meter or 2 of their intended target over the course of a 20+km distance.

God knows how much was invested over the years to develop the system, and even once that's recovered there is still an impressive amount of high precision manufacturing required to make a single one.

I'm positive they're probably making $30k+ per round, but if it does its job is it worth it?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Agreed, but 2 important things in my eyes.

1 - renewable surpluses. As wind and solar keep ramping , hydrogen is a fantastic way to store that energy. Sure, there are efficiency losses but it's transportable, able to be stored long term, and able to be used from small scale to grid scale applications.

2 - total life cycle cost. There is an incredible amount of emissions embodied in evs. Haven't seen a comprehensive analysis of a h2 vehicle but I would imagine a few hundred kilos of missing lithium is a good thing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

That makes sense if you assume we can make "God" (and such a thing is even feasible).

How in any way is a general AI an omnipresent all powerful force of the universe? A single mild solar flare would wipe it out. A blackhole would end it. Poorly configured DNS would end it. Etc. Unless this is some real weak sauce God in which case just call me God

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

What the fuck are you on about?

"if we can create God then God already exists" makes zero sense, and I believe most religious folk would say God needs to do more than know what humans are doing. That's santa. God supposedly created the entire universe which feels a little beyond the reach of GPT.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Genuinely confused by your first statement (in particular effective altruism). What does that have to do with the board?

Not an attack, just actually clueless.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I mean, I haven't actually looked it up, but presumably "news" is information brought to you by a reputable source, so you have some confidence in its accuracy.

The concerning part for me is there's no way tik tok is regulated, or held to any kind of standard. I'm not sure if sources are regularly cited, or confirmed. It feels like gen z / alpha just taking everything at face value, even blatant propaganda, and assuming it as truth because "nobody would just go on the internet and lie"

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Clearly you don't understand Usenet, it's open, you can start your own provider and indexer if you like. Nothing stopping you.

I'd rather not, so I pay to support those who do a good job of it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Even so you still have to seed, meet lame ratio rules, hope that old torrents are still seeded etc.

Torrents certainly still have their place, but Usenet is just generally superior in all aspects, and for a few dollars a month the service it provides is unparalleled.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago (19 children)

Faster, encrypted, no need to seed. Yep, sure is terrible.