MajinBlayze

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

I used option 1 (KeePass synced to Google Drive) for years. It's nice that you know you have control of your passwords at all times, and as long as you can access your cloud storage account and can download a KeePass app, you can get your passwords. It works reasonably well most of the time, but I was consistently running into edge cases that weren't as smooth as I'd have liked (mostly apps on Android)

I switched to vaultwarden (option 3), and immediately fell in love with things mostly just working. However, since I was hosting it out of my house, I had a bit of a disaster recovery problem. If i had say a fire, I could easily lose all copies of my vault, which would be... suboptimal.

After reviewing the options, I switched to straight bitwarden. I've been happy with the experience, and once I have disposable income, I plan to get pro long enough to have emergency contacts available so my family can still get important passwords in case of the worst.

All options have their pros and cons, but IMO password storage is something that deserves to be given proper consideration.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

The album leaves it ambiguous, but it's likely trauma from watching his father kill his mom's lover when he returned from military service.

Then being told you never saw it, you never heard it, you won't say nothing to no one..."

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

What I have here is a bucket

Dear God...

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

What do you mean by opposite position?

That there's an overlap between people who think "climate change is manmade and requires systematic change to overcome" and also "terraforming Mars is a laudable long term goal, but can't be done at the expense of the earth"?

Yeah, there's a lot of overlap there, it's not particularly hypocritical.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

More the other way around, I know a surprising amount of climate change deniers that think we need to colonize Mars to save the human race.

I'm not trying to say it can't or it shouldn't be done, but it has to be both. We have to find a way to live sustainably and also expand.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

There seems to be a large amount of overlap between people who say things like "It's hubris to think that humans can change the atmosphere of the earth enough to make a noticeable difference in 400 years" and "we can make Mars inhabitable by humans in 50 years"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

More antimeme than anything

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Not with that attitude

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Are you confusing "ports" with "interfaces"? I can see that happening since we do colloquially refer to both as ports depending on context.

Each service will bind to it's own "port" which is tied up by that service. However each interface (the external physical connection) supports like 65,000 software ports.

So in practice, no, you don't usually need more than one physical network connection to run multiple services.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How much does God hate Richard Dawkins?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I don't remember Valheim specifically, but most standalone servers don't require you to own the game in the account you use to host it

view more: next ›