Madison420

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 21 hours ago

The CIA and NSA always have bets running on what will happen, it's a very accurate way to estimate actual outcome.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Yes and the baby eating lines were ad libbed so the reaction is genuine, no one expected it.

Ed: Via rob lowe

https://youtu.be/TVV9n6IXrqE?si=YGl4ZG7KDvaddVxn

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Fun stupid as opposed to what? Stern stupid?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Right. Is this your first time encountering an anarchist?

Left. The word you're looking for is correct, right is an affirmation or direction. Nothing, I want you to explain your belief system so you can see it in front of you and go "well that's kinda fuckin stupid huh?.

Undoubtedly so I have no doubt.

Idiots tend to laugh a lot so, par for the course I suppose.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Doubt all you'd like it's not an argument and you didn't know me well enough to think anything more or less. But do go on.

Am I? I tend to refrain from calling people monkeys because of the obvious implied racism.

Not at all, there are better forms of haven't government and given this interaction in 100% proof anarchism doesn't work.

I told you to fucking read because you didn't before the edit dipshit, you can't retroactively act less stupid simply because you edited after the fact. I know what to tell you though, stop crying.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Right is an affirmation of receipt, yes no or maybe are the possible answers and you didn't choose any of the above and still failed to explain.

Anarchism exists yes, that didn't imply you are an anarchist you could be part of any similarly idiotic idealist nonsense.

If it's a battle of wit, you're losing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Not at all.

  • I said anarchism is dumb, you took it personally which is pretty strange honestly. *160, get at me. I've explained my position, you've made fun of me. What exactly you're deducing my intelligence from is at best a curiosity at worst simply made up. *See I don't dislike you, I'd rather a conversation about how school children laugh at anarchists for the stupidity of their ideals. Similarly, you've been the crybaby bitch here and you're doing it now which is amusing. *Add racism? Like I said, you have to be doing Nazi bingo or something. *I don't get people banned crybaby and you probably wouldn't get banned for it no matter how much that might play to your edge lord proclivities.

*Edit= sounds like crying about an edit to me.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (6 children)

There's your explanation then.

No you weren't, you clearly don't care or you wouldn't be playing the troll in another comment chain. Also, no I'm not a conservative and anyway it didn't make sense in context so it was clearly an error. Again, you tried to make light of the situation and stuck your foot directly in your mouth.

I already did that, fuckin read dude it would solve a lot of these issues.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Yes or no being explainations is what? A new concept to you or something.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (6 children)

So you're a douche, you could have saved the inane exposition.

I did, you should read again.

https://lemmy.world/comment/13281517

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (8 children)

You understand what severe dyslexia is correct?

And yet you are still doing it, funny how that is. Notice me not making fun of your disability.

No.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (10 children)

It's a typo in that it's an inadvertantly added word in didn't catch, sure. And yes on both accounts, are you honestly just trying to win "shitty irrelevant things to make fun of" bingo or something?

Ah and yet your last comment said you know me so we know one thing for a fact, you're a liar for whatever that might be worth.

view more: next ›