Never heard of it before.
Kusimulkku
joined 1 year ago
Huh. I think I have the same issue. I just noticed it.
Considering in much of the world Google defaults to AI answers now, it's just a matter of who makes up less incorrect shit
That's cool. Here those not wanting extra equipment have a phone number you use to send the money to
I wouldn't listen to the station if it was your normal commercial channel presenters. I can't stand that shit.
Right. Wikipedia defines it as such
A self-driving car, also known as a autonomous car (AC), driverless car, robotaxi, robotic car or robo-car,[1][2][3] is a car that is capable of operating with reduced or no human input.
But also
Organizations such as SAE have proposed terminology standards. However, most terms have no standard definition and are employed variously by vendors and others. Proposals to adopt aviation automation terminology for cars have not prevailed.
So there's no one definition. It is driving by itself. You don't have to do any driving. But you should keep alert so if something happens you can taker over. Seems like it fits with the general use imo but doesn't fulfill the more stringent definitions.
It's self-driving but you need to supervise it because you are both responsible and because it's not perfect.
I've listened to stations where it's all AI. Presenters are AI, song selection is AI, news and whatnot are read by AI. I actually found it less annoying than your typical commercial radio station.
If it's mostly music and there's a news segment with an AI reading the news, that sorta thing, I don't really see a reason to be upset
I do that too, simply because I'm always carrying around my wallet anyway. But sometimes using my phone is handy (heh). It's just that the constantly changing state or it working and not working makes it so that I can't trust it to work, so I use it less.
Never really been my thing