This is just asking for a new law declaring dying in prison punishable by life in prison.
KoboldCoterie
joined 1 year ago
I work at a company whose entire business model is providing QA to other companies. I work directly with some very large, public companies, and some smaller ones. Almost all of them have some form of dedicated in-house QA, which we supplement.
Documentaries often include recreations of events, such as historical events that weren't filmed. It's usually noted as being a recreation or re-enactment. If AI-created images are used instead and are noted as being such, I don't really see the problem, assuming the images are curated to depict the scene accurately.
Disney+ could introduce linear cable-style streaming channels featuring key franchises
Netflix is reportedly planning to introduce linear cable-style streaming channels to enhance user engagement and increase app usage time.
What? Is Disney's content going to be shown on Netflix in this format? Is it just a typo? I'm so confused.
While that could be a worthy topic of discussion, these scenarios can be immediately addressed using a DMCA counter-notice. BPC’s creator can simply file one with GitLab and in less than two weeks’ time, the platform would have to restore it, if whoever sent the original notice didn’t sue the developer in the United States.
Who is the author of this piece suggesting pays for that potential lawsuit? Like, it's great to say "Oh, they can totally fight this, and they're probably in the right to do so", but companies weaponizing the legal system is basically trivial for them to do, and unless they're offering to help foot that bill, they're putting all the risk on the developer which isn't really fair.
Yeah, it'd be more interesting to see this done with, for instance, an RTS. Something where smarter decisions can beat out faster gameplay some percentage of the time. Obviously high APM is important in an RTS, but in this Street Fighter example, I'm pretty sure a 5 year old who only knows how to Hadouken spam would beat any of these LLMs from what we're seeing here; it's not so much about how good their decision-making is, but just about which ones execute the most moves that have a chance to connect.
My understanding is that this is because of the way they operate internally. They reward new initiatives but not maintaining old initiatives, so employees are heavily incentivized to sunset old apps in favor of new apps that are functional replacements, and this cycle is the result.
catch (Exception e) {
Exception.autofix(e);
}
Done!
Did you even read the article we're discussing, or are you just reading the comments and getting mad?
- No decision has been made. This is simply a judge denying the companies' motion to have this thrown out before going to trial.
- This is very much different than "the gun market" being indirectly responsible. This is the equivalent of "the gun market" constantly sending a person pamphlets, calling them, emailing them, whatever else, with propaganda until they ultimately decided to act on it. If that was happening, I think we'd be having the same conversation about that, and whether they should be held accountable.
- Whether they're actually responsible or not (or whether any group is) can be determined in court following all the usual methods. A company getting to say "That's ridiculous, we're above scrutiny" is dangerous, and that's effectively what they were trying to do (which was denied by this judge.)
If we remove that it become: funnelling a market towards the further consumption of your product. I.e. marketing
And if a company's marketing campaign is found to be indirectly responsible for a kid shooting up a grocery store, I'm sure we'll be seeing a repeat of this with that company being the one with a court case being brought against them, what even is this argument?
They copied and pasted text that had a link in it, and got the alt-text.