KairuByte

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

*Laughs in blazor*

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

I mean, it’s dumb but I know what it is. It’s the painter for the internal frame’s title pane maximize button, which is in the internal frames title, which is in the internal frame.

It’s essentially a dumb way of writing: InternalFrame.Title.MaximizeButton.Painter

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

You’re doing it wrong silly, you charge your butthole with moonlight.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I don’t understand how that can be reliable without being extremely obvious.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Yeah, it’s a problem. You just don’t see it as often yet. A while back there were a large number of communities being blasted by bots, and they would make it into the hot category because nothing else was going on at the time.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

That… isn’t at all what is being talked about here.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Honestly you’re just showing your complete lack of knowledge on the topic. Using your logic, downloading a pirated movie and watching it myself, then immediately deleting it, is not copyright infringement.

Despite the fact that it literally is.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I mean, why are you confident the work in textbooks is correct? Both have been proven unreliable, though I will admit LLMs are much more so.

The way you verify in this instance is actually going through the work yourself after you’ve been shown sources. They are explicitly not saying they take 1+1=3 as law, but instead asking how that was reached and working off that explanation to see if it makes sense and learn more.

Math is likely the best for this too. You have undeniable truths in math, it’s true, or it’s false. There are no (meaningful) opinions on how addition works other than the correct one.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 months ago

Individuals will be nigh impossible to properly handle, but a registered business with a known presence on X won’t be difficult at all.

They aren’t saying they will fine for the use of VPNs, but the continued use of X through alternative means.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Those are not mutually exclusive.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

The secret chats feature isn’t between anyone I believe, it’s between two people. But I don’t actually know for certain because I’ve not looked into it beyond a cursory googling.

That said, you’d be correct in that just like any service out there, the moment you let random people join there’s no level of encryption that can keep your secrets secret.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (10 children)

To be clear, it’s encrypted*.

* If you enable it

view more: ‹ prev next ›