Isthisreddit

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 19 points 5 months ago (5 children)

Meta is just going to scrub all the Cara content into their AI system anyway. They have no fear because there are no real consequences

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

I refuse to pay for a subscription where I don't own the music. CD's, records, tapes - I still do it. I do need to start ripping mp3's off YouTube more though - just a matter of time before shit starts disappearing

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

What about xmms? It was basically a winamp clone, I used to use that on my Linux boxes 20+ years ago

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Nothing wrong with how it was done back then, I still do the same today

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Are you forgetting their conservative personalities like S.E.Cup, Lou Dobbs, etc?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago (3 children)

CNN was never lefty anyway.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago

I will totally agree with you it all does come down to money, but I feel Apple/Tim Cook is still principled in this regard - he has made a stand that the customer is not the product, and the investors/share holders appear to respect this boundary so far. All that is needed is a shithead CEO to come in and squeeze every cent, which at that point might very well be to monetize users like Google. Anything can change tomorrow.

Btw I'm a hobbyist security researcher, and the more I study Apple/iOS/MacOS, the more impressed I am. I don't actually have any apple devices, but I'm really starting to consider it

Inb4 Linux

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

True - show me proof Apple monetizes it's users, then we can continue this discussion

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Why do they have movies on planes? Are we not all pilots on a plane too? Never saw someone with kids in a car 🤣

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago

The problem in all this for me, is that examples like Jobs are pointed to as examples of why this should be done (your entire post basically), and then we have examples like Elizabeth Holmes and Theranos who basically couldn't deliver the technology and kept the "lie" going.

How does one know they can eventually deliver? In your post, you basically assume the problem is solvable with capital. With some promised tech (like Theranos), at what point does "there is a necessary need to gauge the publics interest in a product to evaluate if capital needs to be invested in this space" turn into fraud if the product turns out to be unattainable? (Think cancer cures, limb regeneration, etc)

view more: next ›