That's a paradox. Games are in the unique position to make hardship part of the experience.
If you take out the hardship you wouldn't experience the art in the intended way anyway.
Iapar
joined 1 year ago
I don't believe doing things over public WiFi is that secure as traffic can be logged etc.
Jupp. If you trap someone highly skilled and give that person a weapon, the chances are good that this person will use that against you.
Like how does a less skilled person know that this code will not send location to the police with a message?
I think it was stated that it was jetbrains mono in the first thread.
Addiction.
Your joke is like my asshole. No one gets it.
"Muuhuum, vim is wrecking havoc on relationships again!"
:q looks like a person which jaw hit the desk. Which adequately described me when I found out how to exit vim.
*have a degoogled day
Edit: love the edit!
For real. So much moe stuff posted that I actually learned what it means... Started posting this in every post before blocking the community.
The intended experience is to overcome seemingly insurmountable situations. That can be through brute force (just dodging, attacking) or through deduction (there is a item which kills a boss in 4 hits).
It is about catharsis.
You don't need to have the best reflexes, you need to be involved in the game/world. And that seems to be the problem with people, they don't want that.
It is not about the experience, it is about finishing it. Else I can't explain what "I don't have time for that means"
Like saying I don't have time to read animal farm so I just read the cliffnotes. It is completely absurd because you take time for that other wise you would be missing out on nuance.
Not everything has to be for anybody. But saying "makes this more for people who didn't like it in the first place" is just entitled and rude.
There is so much that is already like everything else with little that makes them stand out. So why take something that is special and make it more generic?