HeartyBeast

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 26 points 6 months ago

You should definitely spend time trawling through Oxfam shops for books, if this annoys you.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago

That sounds as if the register for .ar should be out of a job

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

The casing is the ‘more’

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

If you read back through this thread, you'll see that in no way shape of form have I defended the atrocities carried out by Israel. That doesn't mean that Hamas' actions on Oct 7 weren't also an atrocity. "Yeh, but that was 5 months ago" doesn't feel like suitable rebuttle. No you don't use genocide as a response to attrocity, but that doesn't mean the original massacre wasn't a atrocity.

I think you should should avoid using "lol" in these kinds of discussions.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Fair point to the extent that Palestine isn't a state, Hamas can never commit a war-crime. So that's OK then.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (4 children)

You’re projecting here, I think. I’ve been pretty clear on my position. You haven’t said why you think the Oct 7 attack doesn’t constrain war crime by Hamas.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (6 children)

Yes. My claim wasn’t that Israel isn’t committing war crimes. It clearly is. Possibly genocide too. However, I’m of the opinion that the Hamas attack was a war crime too - hence parties

I hope that’s helpful

[–] [email protected] -2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (8 children)

I await to see how you justify the apparently indiscriminate massacres of 1,139 people - 695 Israeli civilians (including 36 children), and 71 foreign nationals. Let’s set aside the possibility of rapes and sexual assault as they can’t be absolutely verified.

In what way do you believe they were proportional?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (11 children)

Parties. Pretty sure the Hamas October action constituted a war crime too

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

which, when uncontracted, becomes “are I not?”

Nope ‘are not I?’

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

it uses AI to bypass it, way faster than any human can do it

Welp, that’s a fatal flaw

 

Warns of $1.3 billion charge for cutting Virtzilla's costs, rapid shift to subs and sales of the whole vStack rather than individual pieces

view more: next ›