Greg

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This happened to me when I was younger and more silly.
Fuzz: "What's your name?"
Me: "I know my rights, I don't have to tell you my name unless I'm under arrest"
Fuzz: "OK, you're under arrest"
I spent 2 hours in a cell and ended up on the opposite side of town πŸ˜… I 100% deserved it.

[–] [email protected] 154 points 4 months ago (9 children)

The purpose of these kinds of aliases is to disassociate the human's email address from the service. Alias services like this aren't designed to enable multiple signups for a single service. Otherwise it would quickly be a tool abused by spammers, blocked by services, and useless for people.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 4 months ago

It doesn't seem far fetched which is what makes this urban myth appealing. But this red neck theory makes loads of assumptions, like these farmers didn't know how to protect themselves from the sun, these farmers were groomed in a way to reveal their necks, etc. In reality, they would have had solid base tans, worn hats, and probably kept their neck and ears covered with hair.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Funnily enough I think pirating the content from a torrent site would be the easiest option

[–] [email protected] 46 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I'm never buying a Google product again after dealing with their "support" for a warranty repair. I've given Google thousands over the years. What a silly short sighed company they've become.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

The Wikipedia article doesn't link to a 1893 citation. It links for a single paywalled article to make that claim. This sounds like an urban legend loop that seems to make sense until examined.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Farmers also wore hats and covered their necks. My point is that if you saw a red neck 100 years ago it would more likely belong to someone who works indoors, is groomed to expose their neck, and spent the day outside as opposed to a farmer. A farmer would know better, they're not stupid. This is just one of those explanations that sounds logical until you dig a tiny bit.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Modern farming isn't really comparable to folks working the land 100+ years ago. My point is that farmers 100 years ago weren't stupid, they would have protected themselves when necessary and would have earned an impressive base tan.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I am British by decent and lived on a boat for a year. First few months I was burned a few times but after a short while I was fine. Even when I was in places like the Bahamas. That was the same for all the other white folks, only the tourists were sunburned.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I wouldn't take that as gospel giving the single reference for that claim and the discussion for that article https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Redneck

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago

Yacht clubs often have Wednesday afternoon sailing races and those crews often need extra folks on board. I learned sailing that way when I was in university. An inexperienced reliable crew is member is better than an experienced unreliable crew.

view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί