GigglyBobble

Maybe they came far enough that the party now takes over their equipment.

And if the operator was commanded to do it? And to delete the logs? How naive are you that this is somehow makes war more humane?

Unless the operator decides hitting exactly those targets fits their strategy and they can blame a software bug.

Seems pretty obvious, right? Someone on Lemmy once argued, he did it to avoid taxes. Failed to explain how this is profitable in the end though.

This year especially it feels, prices actually went up for Black Friday. They don't even care anymore.

I really wish we could call it tokens (or scam) and make "crypto" stand for cryptography again...

As far as I remember they acted in parallel and pushed the implementation already. They claimed it to be rogue actions of over-enthusiastic devs after the concept paper caused a public outcry.

I haven't followed that issue but Google will continue to try to close us in, for sure.

Implicitly they often do already because web devs have become more and more lazy and don't test any browser but the one they prefer themselves.

And where do you see any resemblance to a blockchain?

From the article it is just cryptographic signing - once by the camera with its built-in key and once on changes by the CAI tool which has its own key.

it was never once an issue

Every Apple thread has at least one of those replies.

at least PC gamers are largely outspoken about DRM and there are pretty popular platforms that cater to them

I fear the day that's no longer the case. Feels like gaming is becoming more "proprietary platform first" with every year.