Alright, Im fine with that definition, thanks for clarifying that.
However, if I invest part of my money (eg. into stocks or ETFs) as you do if you want to start saving money, that would make me a capitalist, wouldnt it? Your previous comment kind of made it seem like all capitalists are evil and rich af...
ethnoreligious state that excludes people of other ethnicities (Arabs, Africans, etc) and other religions (Muslims, Christians, etc)
So what? Thats their business what rules they want to have inside their country. Thats nl reason to attack them.
forced expulsion of those people, so it must be taken down and the genocide must cease.
Forced expulsion is dtill inside their own country. So you take them down with a genocide yourself? Fight fire with fire?
Would you mind elaborating on the "original libertarianism"? What doed that mean exactly? Could really find much...
Freedom good! Borders allow different systems or countries to exist so you have the FREEDOM to choose the one you like the most instead of there being only one option. Borders good!
Why not? Capitalism is the most fair system to me.
An ethnocentric state in a land inhabited by other religions and ethnicities.
What exactly justifies the takedown of Israel? That its religion is different or what? Thats none of ghe other countries business.
Yeah of course thats why there are regulations in place. Nobldy would trust that milj seller again though, so for cases that are not as bad as a human life being ended, the system would still work...
So then, why is their official goal to destroy Israel? Thats 100% a religious war
That's bad. But why are borders bad?
No. Would you say its justified to attack the US today (because of that genocide)? I certainly wouldnt.