Fleur_

joined 2 months ago
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago

The children yearn for the forums

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Okay so for you chocolate isnt worth giving up slavery for but shoes are. Pretty reasonable imo. Def more conscientious than me

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

I'm not taking this banana slander they actually goated fruit

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

I'm interested in everyone's risk of slavery to acceptable to purchase ratio

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I cannot support tesla now that I know they aren't vegan smh

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Yeah cloning isn't really what I'm asking about. Interested in knowing if you can make offspring from two same sex parent cells that have similar genetic makeup/diversity to offspring with 2 different sex parent cells

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (6 children)

I feel cheated by this answer because it seems like the limiting factor is in the natural process of embryo development and not in if the genetic material itself is compatible.

Further in the article it even says it could be possible from 2 sperm cells if you used stem cells to turn a sperm cell into an egg cell? So it is possible then. But only for males? Could you use stem cells to turn an egg cell into a sperm cell and accomplish a similar result from 2 egg cells?

....I'm left with a strong inconclusive as to whether it's possible :(

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

I had the same thought. Like the extent of my knowledge is needing either XX or XY and getting half from each parent but not really sure on the rules or specifics for how things go

 

Idk if this makes sense.

Obviously not via sexual reproduction but could a person's genetic parents be of the same sex and that person be genetically indistinguishable from the rest of the population?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

They're not socialist because the means of production is owned by literally one guy?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

I'm still confused why you're including north Korea as a socialist state

view more: next ›