FaceDeer

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 31 points 6 months ago

Especially given that this particular comment is 90% quotes from some other author.

[–] [email protected] 62 points 7 months ago (1 children)

We've got LLMs now that can do that. Sorry, you've been replaced. Please gather your things into this box and cheer up.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 7 months ago

Actually, you can do exactly that. Fork them.

You can't force the people who are using Github to follow you, of course. But that's every individual's choice.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You think Microsoft is the only "evil corporation" among these? That's very naive. Any hosting service will deplatform users when they can see a profit to be made from doing so.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

"We" as in the conversation as a whole. You joined an ongoing thread.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

So we've moved from "GitHub is not open source" to "GitHub has some support software for peripheral features that is not open-source?" I'm definitely failing to see the rant-worthiness of it at this point. It's certainly not monopolistic, platforms like GitLab and Bitbucket also provide these features. And I'd bet that some of them have their own proprietary software to support these things too.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago (5 children)

There's quite a series of leaps of logic here.

Because Google (not Microsoft) released a project under the BSD license (an open source license) but "everyone on Lemmy" doesn't think it's open source, therefore a hosting site owned by Microsoft (not Google) is not "open source."

I'm not even sure what is meant by GitHub being "open source." It's a hosting provider, not an actual piece of software. The site itself doesn't have a source license. The individual repositories can have licenses, which can be whatever the user who created the repository sets it to be - including open source licenses. Do you mean GitHub Desktop? Microsoft released that under the MIT license. And you don't need GitHub Desktop to use GitHub anyway.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Oh, that's what you meant. How do you contribute to a project on any git host if that git host won't let you? In what way is GitHub any different from that?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (7 children)

You're not "pretty fucked". Just use one of the many other git hosts out there. OP himself lists some of them in his rant.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 7 months ago (8 children)

Microsoft has developed many open-source projects. The view of Microsoft as some kind of anti-open-source crusader is 20 years out of date.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

All of those issues would arise if you wanted to migrate an established project to Github as well.

view more: next ›