What makes adguard home better than pihole? Genuinely curious, I'm running pihole now and have been for a couple of years without issues.
DreadPotato
You should have anticipated this and directed airflow to the windshield before you start driving.
I have also never experienced spontaneous fogging of the windshield while I'm driving, and I live in Scandinavian weather which is both humid and cold. It's always there when I enter the car. The AC dehumidifies the cabin air while driving so it really shouldn't be fogging the windshield out of the blue while you're driving.
But besides that, steering wheel control or voice control cab enable/disable this in many cars these days.
you would know that if you read the article.
I did read it, the snippet I used is from the last part of the article...
This looks more like they intentionally didn't make the gripper on the right close with proper force, especially on the hard products. For soft products a pneumatic/vacuum based tool is normally used instead. Very few robot applications have to pick a wide variety of product types dynamically in a way that makes switching toolheads impossible/too impractical.
As soon as they figure out how to actually mass produce them at an affordable price, and fix the swelling issues during high charging currents, they'll be available.
They designed and built a battery that uses up to 70 per cent less lithium than some competing designs.
This is probably a way of phrasing that means it's up to 70% less than the absolute most lithium-requiring designs that few/no one uses, and probably only marginally better than most designs actually used. Since they're very vague about it, I will be sceptical and assume it is way less revolutionary than the headline suggests.
If the traction control is the same as in the model 3, slipping due to pressing the accelerator too hard shouldn't be a big issue. I can literally floor the accelerator from standstill in the snow and the car barely slips at all and just accelerates slowly until it has better traction (obviously didn't do that on public roads but on private road). It is has way better traction control than my old car had.
I think shitty tires are a more likely culprit.
I mean, technically you're not supposed to be fiddling with neither radio, AC or other crap on any car, touch or not, when you're driving. All of that should be set before you start driving anywhere. If you follow the law to the letter, the only thing you should operate while driving, is what can be done from the steering wheel controls and voice control.
Of course that's now how most people actually drive their cars...
Maybe in the US, you'd get fucked as a property owner where I live if you tried that.
There are usually loads of unenforceable terms and definitions in the ToS you sign. Just because you sign it doesn't make it true or enforceable, and many won't hold up in court even if you've signed the document. But that requires you to spend the energy and money to fight these fuckers.
Why is it that when a human impersonator mimics a voice, it's just fine. But when a computer does it, it becomes a huge ethical issue?
I'm not saying they're not wrong here, I just find it interesting that using an organic method of recreation (an impersonator) is considered fine, but an electronic method (the "AI" in this case) is considered ethically wrong.