Delta_V

joined 11 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Just the opposite.

I left reddit because they don't censor nazis hard enough and will actually ban people for reporting hate speech, calling it an "abuse of the reporting system".

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Storing carbon as sodium formate has the same problem as storing it as trees - bacteria will eat it and release CO2. Its also not useful as portable fuel - its energy density is an order of magnitude less than kerosene.

Its potential use as a battery is interesting though. I can imagine a system where a long lasting catalyst is used to fill a tank of sodium formate using waste CO2 from industrial processes and excess electrical generation capacity from renewable sources like wind and solar, and the machines that use sodium formate to generate electricity at times of low wind and solar generation could potentially be less polluting overall compared to mining lithium for new batteries and recycling worn out lithium batteries.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

a black hole

assuming a thing into existence isn't a satisfying answer

where did your black hole come from? another black hole?

might as well just claim its turtles all the way down

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

AI does not learn and transform something like a human does.

But they do learn. How human-like that learning may be isn't relevant. A parrot learns to talk differently than a human does too, but African greys can still hold a conversation. Likewise, when an AI learns how to make art by studying what others have made, they may not do it in exactly the same way a human does it, but the products of the process are their own creations just as much as the creations of human artists that parrot other human artists' styles and techniques.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Everyone should be assumed to be able to look at it, learn from it, and add your style to their artistic toolbox. That's an intrinsic property of all art. When you put it on display, don't be surprised or outraged when people or AIs look at it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I hope that includes what other sites would call "strictly necessary". No thanks, if your site won't work without, then I don't need to visit.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

There were two hybrid minivans on the market a couple years ago when I went shopping for one. One plug-in from Chrysler and a non-plug-in from Toyota. Both cost about as much as a Model 3.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Or maybe an accessibility improvement. You don't need to practice creating your own works of art over many years anymore, or have enough money to commission a master artist. The AI artists are good enough and work for cheap.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 11 months ago

always has been

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Context matters in this discussion.

The moderators of the lemmy instance OP got banned from have Russian and Chinese iconography in their profiles - its explicitly authoritarian and arguably communist in name only in order to attract naive idealists who otherwise would be against authoritarianism.

[–] [email protected] 71 points 11 months ago

Adding this to your uBlock Origin filters also makes the problem go away:

www.youtube.com##+js(nano-stb, resolve(1), *, 0.001)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The insurance companies will go for it if the data shows driverless cars cause fewer accidents and lower claims versus human drivers, but it seems like that data will be a long time coming because right now the court of public opinion goes nuts when a driverless car hits someone while ignoring all the times that a human does the same. It makes no sense, and I hope the insurance companies can make it make sense soon.

view more: next ›