The question is put on wrong terms. All social order is derived from violence. What make the law, the law is the menace of violence. What supports democratic institutions are the violence of police and military against who don't abide the order. So, violence is inescapable. The righ question is not if it's justified, but WHO and WHEN have the right to commit violence. When put under these terms, it's much more simpler question.
Cochise
joined 1 year ago
(edited) - Should your morals be flexible? How rigid should your moral framework be, and should it depend on background of people in consideration
Plebbit is a peer-to-peer Reddit alternative that allows you to self host and own your own community
Do you think kids should be prohibited from using social media? If yes, how should it be done? If no, why?
If you don't have strong privacy concerns, you can use the free tier vps from oracle cloud or Google cloud. They are small, but are more than enough for this load.