Cleverdawny

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

I just watched both videos and they were just normal coin tosses. What was I supposed to see there? If either person had faked the coin toss, why didn't anyone on the ground complain? The Sanders people were RIGHT THERE and accepted the result.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Lemmy is weird sometimes

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Yes, yes, there are no true scotsmen

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, yes, there are no true scotsmen

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, yes, there are no true scotsmen

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yes, yes, there are no true scotsmen

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, yes, there are no true scotsmen

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

He clearly wasn't. The Buttigieg campaign focuses on turnout in areas the Sanders campaign ignored and won the contest because of the rules of the Iowa caucus, which allocate delegates to each individual precinct not based on their turnout but on their overall population. Sanders did well in highly attended precincts, Buttigieg beat him by outperforming him in less well attended precincts.

It's the way the rules were. Bernie could have employed the same strategy, but he didn't.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (6 children)

ITT people still salty that Pete won Iowa 🤣🤣🤣

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (11 children)

Just don't check the environmental record of communist nations! Uh oh

view more: ‹ prev next ›