4 cores is a bit limiting, but definitely depends on the usage. I only have 1 VM on my NUC, everything else is docker.
I thought all the core processors had VT* extensions, I was using virtualization on my first gen i7. They are very old an inefficient now though.
I5 3470 is old, but its not that bad. Lots of people are homelabing on NUCs which are only very slightly faster. Performance per Watt will be terrible though. (I am on an i7-10710u, and I've yet to run out of steam so far - https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i7-10710U-vs-Intel-Core-i5-3470/m900004vs2771 )
It has VTx/VTd, so should be okay for proxmox, what makes you think it won't work well?
A gpg key has to be stored on something, and that can be stolen or lost. (Or degraded over time).
You are essentially pushing for 1 factor authentication. Its a strong factor, but still just 1.
Within my company there is a mix of Scrum and Kanban, so Agile != Scrum.
I don't think it makes much sense to say "We are switching from Agile to Kanban", but "We are switching from Scrum to Kanban" does make sense (at least to me)
Kanban is Agile. They are pushing Impact Engineering.
elon cant run for pres anyway, he wasnt born in the US.
Maybe try the state->custom setting thing? For some reason I cant find the autorotate setting on my phone :/
There are apps for screen rotation: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=org.crape.rotationcontrol
Perhaps that will do what you want?
I had a quick look, and cant find a way to detect the auto rotate state.
What is your end goal out of curiosity? Do you juat want to have a visual notification of autorotate so you can turn it off? Because an alternative would be to automatically turn it on and off.
I use this:
When in YouTube, Netflix, etc, it enables autorotate, and when you switch out it disables it again.
Last time I observed this I was getting the exact same item that I bought being advertised to me constantly, across multiple sites. No variation at all. It was a pair of hiking shoes. If it had then offered me hiking poles or rain coats or anything else that would have been useful, but instead it was the same pair of shoes I had already purchased.
If the ad network had actually suggested useful paired items that i dont already own, then those ads should actually stand out, as they are actually relevant to me.
If its not cost efficient to actually target to the individual (and I dont doubt that it isn't), im not sure what Paypal is bringing to the table here that Amazon etc can't already do.
I'm sure thats the theory, and whats being sold to the ad buyers, but my money is on it ending up like the ads you get after buying something from amazon/ebay: same item you just bought.
That would be actually valuable for consumers and advertisers. Shame its impossible.
I can't remember exactly what its called, but something like ~~router~~ NAT loopback is what you want. I'll have a look around. But if you set it right, things should work properly. It might be a router setting.
Found it: https://community.tp-link.com/en/home/stories/detail/1726