Unsafe doesn't let you just ignore the borrow checker, which is what generally tripped me up when learning to write rust.
CameronDev
joined 1 year ago
You could be right, in any case, it was a 30s iso3200 exposure in a dim room, it should have blown out, but instead it was very dim and noisy.
I loved PES, had it for ps2. Never got to use the network play though
Could be a camera module limitation? Fwiw, on my s10+, I can set it to 30s, but I don't think its a true long exposure anyway. Seems more like a series of short exposures stacked together, with all the noise that goes with it.
Have you tried lowering the resolution to see if you can expose longer?
Yup, I mispoke, but essentially yes, they could be DC, but at a significantly higher voltage than 12v DC.
Some appliances use the AC frequency to timekeep as well, but given almost all appliances have microcontrollers now, that hardly matters anymore.
I would have thought DC motors would have worse longevity, given they have a wear surface due to the split ring commutator? Unless they are talking about ESC DC motors?
All the small stuff is low voltage DC, but just about every appliance requires AC (ovens, dishwashers, kettles, toasters, washing machines, aircon). Running an oven on 12v DC would be insane.
Concrete is too hot in the sun, melts the tracks. Grass is too ticklish, the tanks get all giggly if left on it.
Carpet is a good middle ground.
For openwrt+wireguard, see: https://cameroncros.github.io/wifi-condom.html
Looks like tailscale should work in openwrt: https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-user/services/vpn/tailscale/start
For the wireguard server, I am using firezone, but they have pivoted to being a tailscale clone, so I am on the legacy version, which is unsupported: https://www.firezone.dev/docs/deploy/docker
Edit: fixed link
Im willing to believe it exists, but not that its any good. 99% is a crazy accuracy claim.
That is a long video, is the paper published somewhere?
Im willing to accept that you can statistically "watermark" the text, but I'm not convinced that it would be tamper resistant, which is a large part of what makes a watermark useful. If it can't survive an idiot with a thesaurus, its probably not gonna be terribly useful.
The arstechnica article speculated it was more of a pattern of words thing.
I think it is lies, and doesn't exist or work anywhere near as good as they claim. Or, its incredibly easy to bypass.
This was pretty clear when observing the output of tldrbot. It would just randomly select paragraphs, ignoring surrounding context, and call it a summary.