CableMonster

joined 9 months ago
[–] [email protected] -2 points 7 months ago (16 children)

Exactly, so what do you do with people that are not valuable enough to pay a "living wage"?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 7 months ago

Who said all human life was not sacred? Who said I dont care about all of those things?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (2 children)

The federal tax receipts/gdp were pretty much the same as they are right now in the 50s and 60s. Just because the tax rate was high doesnt mean people pay that much.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (4 children)

What you are saying is true, but there is not a better option for how the economy works that doesnt end really bad. I dont like bill gates, but the idea that he cant have what he has doesnt end well.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Let me give you an example of why you are incorrect. I just got bids to do an technical project, and the guy that is him and one employee, cost $9500, and the big company cost $15000. The reason is the big company has so much more overhead that they cost more. So small companies could easily outbid the big companies, but the regulations that are good and useless make it too hard for many small companies to exist. If you want to learn about specific regulations I can tell you about them, but I am done arguing about this.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 7 months ago (19 children)

First problem is that "living wage" is a meaningless term because it will very by multiples depending on where you live and your family size/structure. The next problem is that people dont just do a job that needs to be done, they can literally be worth less than you pay them. If they keep making mistakes, or you cant trust that they will correctly do the job or whatever. It can just not be worth the money or extra labor to employ them.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 7 months ago (21 children)

Let me rephrase; what if that person does not bring in enough value to an employer to be worth the amount that you think they should be paid?

[–] [email protected] -5 points 7 months ago

Maybe true in the 90s, but now the liberals seem to be just as war hungry.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 7 months ago (3 children)

There are two completely separate issues that dont make sense to combine unless you just want to use it as a weapon. The question is if the fetus is "sacred" and deserves rights, if so then you cant kill it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Sorry man but you have a fundemental lack of knowledge here. I am not sure what you gleaned this from, or who told you this, but this is just factually incorrect.

view more: ‹ prev next ›