Buttons

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I agree. Price is important in a classic "free market" where people compete to sell goods and services for cheaper and whoever does it best makes a profit and grows, etc, etc.

This ain't a classic free market. We frequently see companies become market leaders without ever earning a profit. That's not a classic free market.

Succeeding as a company because you make customers happy sounds nice, but the most powerful companies today succeed by gaining favor from those already in power (venture capitalists, etc), and the customers are just a bargaining chip to be tossed around on the bargaining tables of the wealthy.

[–] [email protected] 293 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (30 children)

Ads will always be detectable because you cannot speed up or skip an ad like you can the rest of the video.

If they do make it so you can speed up or skip the ad sections of a video, mission accomplished.

If all else fails, I'd enjoy a plugin that just blanks the video and mutes the sound whenever an ad is playing. I'll enjoy the few seconds of quiet, and hopefully I can use that time to break out of the mentally unhealthy doom spiral that is the typical YouTube experience.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Click all the ads too please

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Good call, the shape arranging mechanic existing in board game form before Tetris, and the "challenge approaching from the top of the screen" thing was a staple of many many Atari and arcade games.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (8 children)

Name a game you have enjoyed that isn't a ripoff.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Okay. You don't like the word "similar" I guess. What word would you use?

It is certainly not the same.

[–] [email protected] 179 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (51 children)

Patents and video games huh? We can't ignore what John Carmack had to say about this:

The idea that I can be presented with a problem, set out to logically solve it with the tools at hand, and wind up with a program that could not be legally used because someone else followed the same logical steps some years ago and filed for a patent on it is horrifying.

--John Carmack

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (11 children)

If we allow this to continue, we will end up with more content for players to enjoy.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (11 children)

They didn't copy Pokemon, they created new content that is similar to Pokemon.

Do you believe it is wrong to create new content that is very similar to existing content that people enjoy?

Is it wrong for Pocket Pair (Palworld's creator) to create new content that is similar to existing Pokemon? Is it wrong for GameFreak to create new content that is similar to existing Pokemon? Morally speaking, why are the answers to those questions different?

view more: ‹ prev next ›