Different applications have better performance on one vs other. Google Cloud still offers a lot of Nvidia options.
Bitrot
joined 1 year ago
Normal based on what? The ads exist because plenty of normal people use them to decide where to buy things or certain items. If they didn’t bring people in the stores wouldn’t bother.
Do you regularly use their ads to compare prices and select what to buy at each one, or generally stick to one place with a few trips to another one?
I think you explained it fine, it just doesn’t make sense to people who only go to the same place.
Difficult to fix if exploited.
Can be patched beforehand.
It’s not just the title that is poorly written. The entire thing is written like “the sky is falling because memory chips and big computer stuff has a broken”.
According to them, “The threat intel data noted in this report is available to tens of thousands of customers, partners and prospects – and hundreds of thousands of users.”
It seems like they are trying to say their network is fine.
How dare they not commission a piece.
They are watching DHCP Discover option 55. The device tells the server what options it expects to receive, and different vendors and device ask for different options or ask for them in a different order, and they are fingerprinting that.
Cisco also describes the tactic: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/identity-services-engine/116235-configure-ise-00.html
The fingerprints are viewable at https://github.com/karottc/fingerbank/blob/master/dhcp_fingerprints.conf - it is more specific than a mac vendor but not extremely anti-privacy, anybody watching firewall logs will know an iPhone connected pretty easily too.
You need to say more than that about what your concern is, especially on devices configured for Mac randomization and other privacy features.
Aruba is looking at the dhcp traffic and inferring information about the device. The device is not sending all of this data.
That’s also empty weight on the Learjet, gross weight is higher. This one is presumably that weight with the batteries so I suspect is smaller. Wish there were more details.
view more: next ›
The bot demonstrated very well what this article is about. I don’t know the internals, but I also can’t image the bot was using the best and most expensive ways of doing analysis.
It was pretty bad at “getting the point” even when it was obvious, a better system should be able to do so. Sometimes the point is more difficult to discern and there has to be some judgement, you can see this in comments sometimes where people discuss what “the point” was and not just the data. I imagine an AI would have some difficulty determining what is worth summarizing in these situations especially.