For example.
But honestly I was more joking. The thing that makes most projects useful is the developers developing it, and they can't clone that
Azzu
joined 1 year ago
They're not supposed to, it's just about blocking them from using the software :)
The real solution is to include a few tiananmenSquare variables in all the repositories. Either they exclude the entire repository or just the specific file, in either case the entire project may be unusable.
With Proton, a large majority of games run on Linux, and most even better than on windows.
Huh I thought I've been downloading stuff with ipfs from them the whole time
But the thing is, we don't need to develop products. New products are just further resource usage, more greenhouse gasses, more "infinite growth". Also, a company or individual having "an edge" in competition by developing something first is simply waste of resources. Now only they are allowed to improve upon it, make it more efficient, whatever. If this didn't exist, yea they'd be incentivized less to create it in the first place, but also now everyone could take it and make it better.
We have to go away from thinking as individuals in the direction of thinking as humanity.
Doesn't a SpaceX engineer technically already have a sugar daddy?
Any new client doesn't get old messages. Phone only allows the possibility of transferring a backup, which desktop doesn't have.
I'm sorry, can everyone not read the actual link? They specifically say they are not training generative AIs, i.e. LLMs.
They are using the data to train non-generative AIs for stuff like emoji and channel suggestions. I.e. "you use this emoji a lot, so it's displayed first" or "people that are in these channels of yours also join these other channels you're not in yet".
This is class A misinformation being spread here, good job. It's unbelievable that I'm the first one to actually verify the truth of this post, because I wanted to share it further and that's what you do before.
That's how it is currently and maybe also your opinion. But that doesn't mean it has to be like that in a society. It's your opinion that everything public can go private at any time (training proprietary private AI), but we can decide as a society that's not how we want to do things. We can require stuff that used public data to be public as well.
And yeah I kinda get to choose that. As democratic society, anything that the public (i.e. including me) decides, goes. Of course, if there are people like you that don't want stuff trained on public data to be required to be public, democracy will also work in the sense that we don't get that, as it is currently.
I don't have a source on hand, but I'm sure that a pronounced chin has been found in studies as male attractiveness symbol