Ascyron

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Basically, he's a CEO and therefore thinks every dollar on earth is his by right. I think the best summary is that he's using his competing positions at the non-profit foundation to benefit his for-profit company.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Tl;Dr is that matt mullenweg saw that other people were making money from free open source software, and his capitalism boner is trying to fuck everyone over.

He has control over both WPEngines competition and the non-profit Foundation, and is using his Foundation position to try extort his for-profit company's competition. Typical CEO behaviour.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

This whole drama makes me wonder if it's only a matter of time till I have to migrate my company away from WordPress.

Man, fuck matt mullenweg

[–] [email protected] 22 points 5 months ago (1 children)

In my country we've had these electronic labels for many years, using them was part of my first real job a decade ago. And here they definitely can be updated centrally, and in near real time.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 6 months ago (1 children)
  1. Mayor says the city will stop using tech by the end of 2024.

  2. Tech is still operational in April 2024 (8 months before the end of 2024).

  3. Breathless expose article showing that the tech is still in use.

  4. Profit???

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (4 children)

If one owned a real switch would that alter any of the steps? Like, I imagine whatever keys you need would be on it?

For the record I know nothing and am just guesstimating based on 90's PS1 emulation.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

More like, OpenAI has said "so what if we were speeding, everyone does it" (did that work last time you got a ticket?)

Relevant exerpt from the article: "The company recently made a similar argument to the UK House of Lords, claiming no AI system like ChatGPT can be built without access to copyrighted content."

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (21 children)

Bruh idk why the difference... Educate me?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Honestly, Wikipedia doesn't avoid this. People constantly game the rules to remove or change content that doesn't suit them. I recall an instance where employees of a company were busted editing that company's page, they were caught because there were so many different editors all from the same corporate IP. And that's just the low hanging fruit that makes the news - I would wager there's 10 instances that never get noticed for each one that people spot.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

Ah yes, a 650k company for a company making billions.

Proprtionate to my own income, that's like $50 fine. Pathetic.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If Im reading the GitHub history right, this PR was accepted at age 3 years and 1 day? Guess the cake worked!

view more: next ›