Use of incendiary weapons against military targets is not a war crime unless in an area where civilians are present.
Apollo42
joined 6 months ago
Of course they do, it's main use is smoke generation.
Fair enough, I can see how that might be beneficial.
Ok fair enough, I see how that would be a win.
Is it really a win for LLMs if the study found no significant difference between those using it as a tutor and those not?
Audio description.
The fact that only replied to the person agreeing with you and not the 10 people who disagreed with you is pretty telling.
I'm sorry, but unless you exposed any US war crimes I'm not sure I can take you seriously.
What US war crimes have you exposed?
Why waste time replying just to behave like a child?
Did you even read the links you posted?
view more: next ›
Can you point out the part of the geneva conventions that make using incendiary weapons against military targets in non civilian areas a war crime?