ApexHunter

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

This is the correct way to manage a budget.

The budget software I use ("you need a budget") follows a similar philosophy; based on the way you describe you financial circumstances, paying for that software is probably not in your budget, but I suspect you will find the "rules"/method/philosophy described on their website helpful.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

They're supposed to be good a transformation tasks. Language translation, create x in the style of y, replicate a pattern, etc. LLMs are outstandingly good at language transformer tasks.

Using an llm as a fact generating chatbot is actually a misuse. But they were trained on such a large dataset and have such a large number of parameters (175 billion!?) that they passably perform in that role... which is, at its core, to fill in a call+response pattern in a conversation.

At a fundamental level it will never ever generate factually correct answers 100% of the time. That it generates correct answers > 50% of the time is actually quite a marvel.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

m68k assembly was my favorite back in the day.

[–] [email protected] 54 points 3 months ago (8 children)

This isn't going to hurt Google's antitrust cases at all... Noooo sir.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The joke is that, regardless of how the type is declared in json, you are parsing a string. (your json blob is just a series of characters, not raw binary data)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

Avocado toast or peanut butter toast. I guess technically there is some sort of cooking involved there but it is minimal...

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

The reply would have been return x % 2 == 0, or if you wanted it to be less readable return !(x&1).

But if you were going for a way that is subtly awful or expensive, just do a regex match on "[02468]$". You don't get a stack overflow with larger numbers but I struggle to think of a plausible bit of code that consumes more unnnecessary cycles than that...

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (5 children)

Is this meant to be a joke or is it intended to be a serious solution?

Asking for someone who lacks a sense of humor.

Ok, fine, I'm asking for me. That person is me.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

They also won't be able to tell you if Microsoft has plans to deport you to Mars.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The lite, being the cheapest model in that line, unsurprisingly only supports 2x2 mimo. Getting 600mbps from that is actually really good, but given net bandwidth is nearly identical to what is available for wifi5 I'm not surprised you didn't see much of a difference.

An ap with 4x4 mimo would substantially outpace your wifi 5 router.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (4 children)

They're is so much wrong here I don't know where to start.

  1. get a better wifi 6ap. You should be getting about 2x the bandwidth. I get about 900mbps on my 5 year old cell phone sitting on the couch.

  2. Wi-Fi 7 smaller width channels to avoid interference. Pretty much everything you've said here is backwards/wrong and i encourage you to do some learning on your own.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Yes, you can legally make derivative works, but without license, it has to be fair use. In this case, where not only did they use one whole work in its entirety, they likely scraped thousands of whole NYT articles.

Scraping is the same as reading, not reproducing. That isn't a copyright violation.

view more: next ›