The clever centrists with their interesting comments haven't changed either.
AlwaysNowNeverNotMe
joined 1 year ago
I found this episode riveting, until it turned into a 20 minute commercial for a children's book.
Still a very interesting theory.
More specifically because the vast majority of cases will either never be filed or in rarer circumstances be easily settled out of court with an initial low-ball. Judgements often take this into account but by limiting the maximum payout it could be argued that that was the price of a human life. You are free to look this up but it's settled law barring several notable exemptions.
https://www.carlsonattorneys.com/news-and-update/liebeck-v-mcdonalds
It was in the specific moment that tort reform limited damages to 250,000 because they blamed an old Lady for getting burned by her 170° coffee. Though she was awarded like 7.6 million as an additive damage because.mcdonalds had been gently warned several times before
I love how it's gone so far beyond "We would like to assist people in paying their taxes."
"We would like to prevent the US government from examining the possibility of creating it's own online tax filing portal."
"We would like to advertise our product as free using government channels and grants only to then turn around after the user has input their most sensitive data into our database and attempt to wring them for $100.00 or not be bound by our privacy policy."
That's something I think should be a growing sentiment, guillotines are now viewed as barbaric, but they were designed to be as humane as possible.
These corpos are unworthy of that consideration.
Whew !memes sure does have a lot of faciest apologia.
If you just used slang I doubt there would be any way to make a case, besides not like you give receipts.
Truly one of the combinations of words on a screen.
Removed a bug preventing fungi from colonizing mammals.