I believe it works so well on those who are in a bad financial situation because whatever little money they make, they want to/need to keep as much of it as possible.
That makes them an easy target of "we're going to lower taxes." While of course only doing it for the wealthy and screaming the left wants to give your hard earned money to lazy people, immigrants, sex changes or whatever marginalized group is the flavour of the year to attack.
I remember way back, I got into an argument with an antivaccer on formula1 of all places. He was so detached from reality it's kinda scary. Of course he posted frequently on conspiracy. It's like nothing matters, nothing can be true outside of that echo chamber.
They really don't believe their eyes, it's kinda scary.
I never said you were in favour of it, another assumption you're making. You asked why the downvotes and the answer is your strawman argument(s), and being against geoblocking and pro privacy isn't mutually exclusive.
Poor strawman mate. You don't have to be "a geoblocking fan," you can despise it, while also not enabling privacy invasive firms.
I live there. And as someone else said, get a job that will relocate you or apply for a school is likely the easiest way in.
Apparently they just posted from other instances
Unrelated, but has anyone noticed that almost all posts and comments have at least one downvote?
Very surprised no-one mentioned History Unobscured