Alph4d0g

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

And gives middle managers another way to misinterpret sh1t they don't understand.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

I don't think it's possible to agree more with this. This would be the strongest fodder for the existence of pure evil if one were to argue that position.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

Agreed on all of that. As I understand it, periods of better worker markets make for less of that nonsense people are willing endure. I've seen a recent trend of corporations turning up the BS because the job market has been tightening up and people are less willing to take risks.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

Fair! I intended to have it in the original post but it didn't take. Likely my error.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 9 months ago

I guess the shame and expense Sony learned the hard way in 2005 has faded and now kernel invasion has become acceptable.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 10 months ago

We had a CVS Pharmacy location near me that decided to leave that location. Self checkout there was based on assuming everyone was a thief. All their wounds were self inflicted. Almost everything was locked up and you could never find someone to get your item for you. The genius management thought it was going to help profitability by deterring theft. Instead it was a deterrent to willing and eager customers wanting to buy their stuff. When you step over a dollar to get to a dime, your business is on borrowed time.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

I'm just of the general opinion that any personal data you entrust to any corporation is going to be at risk - regardless of it's assurances. There's also a risk of that corporation being legitimately acquired by another thus nullifying previous TOS, etc. Or worse case, they sell all your info anyway. Connected technology is moving quickly. What might seem safe to share today could become the basis of an insurance claim denial when they discover a genetic predisposition they believe you were obligated to disclose.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Don't on tread me

[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago

Would be interesting to see a gui that maximizes the content based on rotation if that were even possible

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

There's an old saying in Tennessee - I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee - that says, fool me once Darlene, shame on - shame on you. Fool me - you can't get fooled again.

[–] [email protected] 65 points 11 months ago (3 children)

I'm sure it didn't go well. If it was somehow framed in a sycophantic way where the police were led to believe it was their idea, I'm sure it would have gone better. Wait that might not be too difficult to do.

view more: ‹ prev next ›