For now. If YT really wants to end it, they can
A2PKXG
joined 1 year ago
The EU decided that it rather doesn't have any platforms than some which allow hate/propaganda/childabuse. The intent is to fight the mentioned things and ideally remove them from society. By and large, this decision is a democratic one and fine.
Platforms may continue operation, if they promise to remove all stuff. Here there are two options, one stipulating that all content needs to be checked before its published. Thats the draconian approach. Currently its fine to only go after user reported stuff.
Now to your first question: They fon't gaf about musk and don't care if he removes the stuff. But if he choses not to, they will shutdown twitter for europeans. Thats why they adress him, because he as a major shareholder and CEO (is he?) calls the shots there.
It's my go-to player for various podcasts. I don't end up watching, just listening. But it's YouTube nonetheless.
While I don't normally use it for music, the magic of it's recommendation engine has led me into several amazing music niches, wich I wouldn't have found otherwise.
At least in Germany there are Limits to t&c's. To put it simply, there musn't be any ugly surprises.
The merchant retroactively cancelling your purchases would be an ugly surprise of that nature.
Ianal, but I assume they might get into trouble for the use of words like buy and own, if this is how they treat the purchases.
That's business. Bmw isn't a cost effective brand in the first place, so anyone on a budget shouldn't complain in the first place
People with less might just not complain loudly
The only thing that matters is voting with your wallet
The reason while they have all the content, is precisely because they can generate revenue for channels. I much prefer payment through subcription and ad views to annoying in video sponsors and product placements