2nsfw2furious

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Linux kernel doesn't include a spell checking dictionary soooooo Linux doesn't worry about whether things are words. Your particular spellchecker doesn't seem to think linux is a word but "aspells dict on my machine doesn't consider linux a word" sounds a lot dumber (because it is pretty dumb)

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Forcing someone to use a different form of media to get acceptable support for your product is pretty bullshit. If I can sign up for, pay for, and use your product for years without a telephone, I shouldn't suddenly be forced to use a phone to get support.

Even if that might be the best solution at this point, it's still garbage and something to justifiably complain about, especially considering it's mildly infuriating we're talking about.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

wearing an AOT t-shirt is an advert

Idk what AOT is, but branded t shirts are pretty much advertisements by definition.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Exactly this myself. Debian lxc with jellyfin repo added, media on ZFS with passthrough mountpoints, very performant and easy to maintain.

Docker just adds layers of complexity for no benefit here

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Jellyfin is also conveniently packaged as a .deb and provide a repo for Ubuntu/Debian. It's pretty easy to spin up a Debian container, add the repo, and apt install jellyfin, IMHO easier than doing the same thing with a VM, then docker...

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I love the idea of capturing the language for the future, but it's so sad to think of a spoken language dying.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Yet more reasons to hate "cloud" ai services. Free the models! Selfhost!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There are centrifugal fans that are quite flat but they intake airflow from a different axis they exhaust it from. Could still work

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is there any reason PCs can't just receive HDMI/displayport input from other devices through the same mechanism they output it?

I'm going to be crude here: is there any reason your bladder can't slurp your pee back up from the toilet when you're thirsty?

Can you reverse your monitor to suck in light and behave like a camera?

If you push your car backwards does it suck up CO2 and fill up the gas tank?

Most things in life aren't as bidirectional as we'd like. Video cards use electrical drivers to push signals down the display cables, which is completely different than using what are basically sensors to detect signals coming the other way. It would be quite expensive to design a GPU that does a good job of both, and mostly pointless.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

This is just automatic Photoshop - if all you were doing with graphic design was pasting blond hair onto a brunette, yes, this has really screwed you (or made your job a lot easier). If you're actually doing any level of design... you're safe for now

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

Let me know when I can run it locally... "Open"AI

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, that's kind of my point. It implies strength in the bill that really isn't very strong at all, while staying technically correct

view more: next ›