01189998819991197253

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

Maybe you shouldn’t have PULLED A CROWDSTRIKE

FTFY

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Reminds me of this hahaha (~23 seconds in).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Horrible how? I've always thought they were pretty solid in the arena.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Maybe it's also a "it's the way we've always done it" BS that plays into it, too?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Correct me if I'm wrong, but the only reason to limit password length, is to save carrying cost on the database. But the only reason that this would be value added, is if the passwords are encrypted in reversible encryption, instead of hashed. Isn't this against some CISA recommendation?

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 months ago

Why use this instead of Veracrypt?

[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Their team is probably using adBlockers more than the rest of us. They understand the depth of the surveillance baked into those ads.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

Dangit. Now I want a burger...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago
[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago

it seems totally vacant

OP did say that "the content is more “pleasant department store”". Have you been to a department store lately? They're pretty vacant lol

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

It is enchanting...

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Can’t remember the name, though

It goes by many names...

view more: ‹ prev next ›