Nord has a bad reputation for privacy, maybe change your provider? Use mullvad or proton if you want a better experience.
I think it would be safe to assume that they are blocking some things due to their background, that could be your problem.
this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2023
21 points (100.0% liked)
Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ
53948 readers
478 users here now
⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.
Rules • Full Version
1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy
2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote
3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs
4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others
Loot, Pillage, & Plunder
💰 Please help cover server costs.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Which background? Can you share some references?
Agreed Mullvad is the best provider, but Proton? I don't know.. I remember some news about how they shared info with security agencies, about a user that was (allegedly) a terrorist..
Nord had a big data breach that showed they collect protocols.
Source? I recall that they only changed their policy from "we will not comply with a request," to, "we comply with lawful requests," and the breach was about confidence, not showing they gathered data they claimed not to gather. They still maintain that they don't log connection details, only payment and account creation, but the rewording of the policy at least implies that they could log more "if asked," which does leave the user wondering.
Unless you know something I don't...
They where forced to,but the Swiss authorities don't order such things usually, and especially not when its from outside Switzerland.
AirVPN is good too
Did your token expire?
Actually, it may not be my VPN. I was able to get it to run with a nordlynx container. It seems that there is something up with my qbittorrent container. It updated in the last 2 weeks and I all of a sudden started to get this error:
Web UI: Unable to bind to IP: localhost, port: 8090. Reason: Unsupported socket operation”.
I tried to delete the image and re-pull and nothing seems to be working.
How about netstat -tunlp | grep 8090 ?
netstat -tunlp | grep
I got back a tcp/tcp6 with the docker_proxy and the PIDs. I killed the processes and then rebuilt the container and it still has the same problem. This was working with no changes on my end for months.
I figured it out. An update messed with my qBit configuration. I had to nuke the app data and rebuild the image and it worked like a charm
That's kind of over my head.
Is another app using 8090?