this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2023
86 points (95.7% liked)

Technology

59440 readers
5020 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Implying Apple cares about that. It's what they refer to as "the cost of doing business", if recalling and repairing the phones was cheaper than this they'd have done it.

If they want to make a statement that companies are expected to do the right thing then they have to levy a fine that actually hurts when they don't. This won't do that.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Idk why you got downvoted, you're right, apple is literally one of the wealthiest companies in the world, this is nothing to them

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Even if it is "the cost of doing business" it makes doing business this way slightly more expensive and unpredictable.

Will it be enough to make apple change? Maybe not, but the sum of all the trials push them towards more sustainable solutions.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I like your optimism, but you're dreaming.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Remember the Samsung battery issues being all over the news a few years ago and everyone saying, "Apple never has these problems"? Meanwhile Apple was literally breaking people's phones to reduce fires and paying people off to keep quiet about their battery fires. Nice. 🔥

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The iGiant could now potentially be forced to cough up £853 million ($1.03 billion) in damages if it loses the collective action case, Guttman told The Register.

This paves the way for millions of consumers, who were left paying for battery replacements or new phone models, to receive the compensation they deserve," Gutmann said in a canned statement.

Today, however, brings us one step closer to levelling the playing field and holding one of the world's biggest and most powerful corporations accountable for its actions."

The decision by a three-person tribunal at the Competition Appeal Tribunal is not a finding of fact Instead it approved a “Collective Proceedings Order” – a rough UK equivalent to a class action – on grounds that the plaintiffs or proposed class representative (PCR) have a decent chance of winning the case by arguing that Apple was not transparent about the fact its software updates impacted users' iPhones.

This impacts both the questions of the existence of abuse and the manner in which loss to the class is to be assessed," states the Tribunal’s decision [PDF].

France fined the fruit-phone outfit €25 million for failing to notify users that software updates would mean older iPhones will get slower over time.


The original article contains 528 words, the summary contains 205 words. Saved 61%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!