this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2025
217 points (94.7% liked)

Technology

71396 readers
2917 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Google says a new AI tool on its search engine will rejuvenate the internet. Others predict an apocalypse for websites. One thing is clear: the current chapter of online history is careening towards its end. Welcome to the "machine web".

The web is built on a simple bargain – websites let search engines like Google slurp up their content, free of charge, and Google Search sends people to websites in exchange, where they buy things and look at adverts. That's how most sites make money.

An estimated 68% of internet activity starts on search engines and about 90% of searches happen on Google. If the internet is a garden, Google is the Sun that lets the flowers grow.

This arrangement held strong for decades, but a seemingly minor change has some convinced that the system is crumbling. You'll soon see a new AI tool on Google Search. You may find it very useful. But if critics' predictions come true, it will also have seismic consequences for the internet. They paint a picture where quality information could grow scarcer online and large numbers of people might lose their jobs. Optimists say instead this could improve the web's business model and expand opportunities to find great content. But, for better or worse, your digital experiences may never be the same again.

On 20 May 2025, Google's chief executive Sundar Pichai walked on stage at the company's annual developer conference. It's been a year since the launch of AI Overviews, the AI-generated responses you've probably seen at the top of Google Search results. Now, Pichai said, Google is going further. "For those who want an end-to-end AI Search experience, we are introducing an all-new AI Mode," he said. "It's a total reimagining of Search."

You might be sceptical after years of AI hype, but this, for once, is the real deal.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 hours ago

The article is also full of bullshit and it gets basic history wrong. The agreement was never made, but to the extent it exists anyway, it was never supposed to be about a monopoly that's destroying shit. Once upon a time, not even very long ago, there were competing search engines.

I know tech writers want to write stories that sound fancy, but if they don't know the facts and the history then they need to find someone to proofread their work more carefully.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Google is about to become AOL. 😂 The walled garden is going to get destroyed by the open web, again.

Ads already destroyed the web. Developers wanting to make web apps instead of web pages already destroyed the web. Google is trying to prop up the corpse of its dead brand by capturing people in their chat bot.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 hours ago

Correction: Intrusive ads

[–] [email protected] 6 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

This is Google's attempt at staying relevant now that it's search engine is far from being the best and people are getting their information from TikTok and other sources. Their AI is garbage at even finding factual data. No, this will not cause a "webpocalypse". There's already systems in place to send AI's forcing their way into websites into mazes of infinite useless information to poison them.

At the end of the day, every search engine's purpose is automating the curating of websites. People can go right back to human curated lists if the worst of the "webpocalypse" happens. People also need to start relearning that the internet existed before Google and social media, and it will exist after.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago

The problem with human curated lists is that in order to block bots everything will require an account to access. That's the real tragedy here.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Here is your cupcake recipe:

Ingredients:

  • 1 cup of water
  • 1 cup of flour
  • 1 American Freedom Edition Tariffed Egg
  • 12 oz of polonium
  1. Mix ingredients
  2. Place in oven at 1000° C
  3. Close all windows and disable any smoke or carbon monoxide alarms
  4. Leave the oven door open, place one (1) bottle of butane inside
  5. Enjoy! 😋
[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I literally just tasted this at Costco...you know, with their polonium sampling Ladies... It was delicious! I only wish my backyard polonium trees grew faster. I know I'm gonna get a good polonium harvest next year for sure because this year I got a couple of polonium flowers that went to fruit but got dropped in a wind storm.

Anyway I really recommend those cupcakes an your recipe. Its great!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 hours ago

I replaced the polonium with 1 cup of citrus juice. It was incredibly acidic and soggy. 3/5 because I still like cupcakes.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I have friends working on ways for content providers to charge AI training models. But I have a feeling that's not enough.

The future will have to be where creators have an incentive to consistently create, and consumers pay for what they like, or services to keep them informed and entertained without them having to do much.

In between will sit middlemen and aggregators to enable a smooth flow. Who that will be and what they do in this next phase is the big question.

Under the current method, Google's search and ads groups are competing against each other. Don't see that going well for anyone.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

I just want a platform for independent creators with no ai or clipping,wild how that doesn't exist, or just a platform for creatives, will never happen, my feed will always be ppl yapping about nonsence division over race, gender, religion, never what I care about, which is entertainment, idc all I care about is art and entertainment not why ppl hate all men, women, black, indian , etc. ppl or why someone else saying that hurt them, it never ends.

I just want to see original content made by people trying, some effort put in, time spent editing, creating, planning, etc. I don't want to waste my time watching stuff where people don't put any time in themselves. Clipping and Ai is so annoying, if ppl want to post their own content thats fine, but my feed on these platforms ends up being purely twitch streams, tv show clips, movie scenes, low effort ai video generation, etc.

Ideal platform would require your content actually being original, ppl posting unoriginal low effort content would actually get banned, no direct prompt to video/image ai, fine if its used ethically (masking tools, etc.) and in an actually skilled way (very rarely do see that on ocassion by 3d artists combining their stuff with ai), but the vast majority are throwing out low effort garbage to spam content hoping it hits the algorithim and blows them up so they can automate and make money)

Never happening tho.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That fucking AI thing absolutely sucks for anything factual. I’m a journalist and noticed that it gleefully listed all sorts of factual errors in that AI summary. Stuff that you can see correctly on the original pages, but it somehow manages to misinterpret everything and shows incorrect information.

And knowing how lazy people are these days, most will happily accept Google’s incorrect information as fact. It’s making me very, very nervous for the future.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

My wife and I both googled the same question yesterday and it gave us both completely different answers.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 20 hours ago

Its a stochastic process

[–] [email protected] 2 points 16 hours ago

Sounds like it's perfectly accomplishing Google's goal to disinform. I suspect it will get more clever at sounding correct over time too.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 23 hours ago

Dead Internet theorists were right, just a half decade or so early.

[–] [email protected] 125 points 1 day ago (13 children)

Quit.... Using... Google... Search

[–] [email protected] 76 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just to reiterate - don’t use Google

[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 day ago (1 children)

To avoid misunderstandings: FUCK GOOGLE

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 day ago (5 children)

For those who didn't get it... GOOGLE IS SHIT, DON'T USE!

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"about to destroy the web" ???

Where have you been these last 10 years? It's been getting worse for a long time, even before AI. It's just getting worse quicker now.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 22 hours ago

This is fundamentally worse than a lot of what we've seen already though, is it not?

AI overviews are parasitic to traffic itself. If AI overviews are where people begin to go for information, websites get zero ad revenue, subscription revenue, or even traffic that can change their ranking in search.

Previous changes just did things like pulling a little better context previews from sites, which only somewhat decreased traffic, and adding more ads, which just made the experience of browsing worse, but this eliminates the entire business model of every website completely if Google continues pushing down this path.

It centralizes all actual traffic solely into Google, yet Google would still be relying on the sites it's eliminating the traffic of for its information. Those sites cut costs by replacing human writers with more and more AI models, search quality gets infinitely worse, sourcing from articles that themselves were sourced from nothing, then most websites which are no longer receiving enough traffic to be profitable collapse.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Got a machine web

It’s better than the rest

Green to Red

Machine web

[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago

I understood that reference.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

I'm gonna say it.

Of the buttrock bands that followed Nirvana's model,... Bush was the best one, for three albums anyway.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 day ago

I'm betting on Google destroying Google instead.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›