this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2025
264 points (97.8% liked)

Privacy

38476 readers
1089 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

An Italian parliamentary committee has confirmed that the government used the Israeli-made spyware Graphite, developed by the offensive cyber company Paragon, to hack the smartphones of several activists working with migrants.

The committee confirmed that Paragon provided Graphite to two Italian agencies, including the country's external intelligence service, starting in 2023. The version of Graphite provided did not include the ability to activate the phone's microphone or camera, the report said. Instead, it only enabled its operators access to encrypted communications on the hacked devices.

The report also confirmed that Graphite exploited a vulnerability in WhatsApp that Meta identified and patched in December 2024, one month before the spyware's activity was publicly disclosed. The vulnerability's discovery also caused "panic" at Israel's military intelligence Unit 8200, according to the recent Israeli television report.

all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 13 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 71 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Say the line Bart!

sigh, "Unlike insert socialist country here, the West has freedom of speech and the right to express your opinions without the secret police coming after you."

YAYYYYYYY!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Fuck all those spying countries. But yea still I believe in the west you get in trouble for acting, not just speaking

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

This is a cool way to protect a belief, narrowing the scope so that the refuting data do not apply anymore. Perhaps I can write a fucking essay about it, but do you have data to support this narrowing move? There is like a ton of data that the West has been invasively spying of possible threats to the status quo (from Cointelpro to undercover UK cops like recently), not just people "acting on it". Furthermore, actions can fall under protected free speech as well, like putting up a poster, demonstrating, and protesting. So your proposal is inherently undemocratic if you roll back freedom to only protect oral expression, quite similar to a "Don't ask don't tell" attitude towards gay people. What you just said is simply counter-factual. Blanket surveillance is a staple of Western societies in the 21st century, and it blows my mind that there are still people oblivious to what is more or less spelled out clearly in the Patriot Act and all laws modeled after it across the globe.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago

well said, i wish eurolibs would get this through their head, but i'm wishing for too much

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Sure, any censorship, spying and oppression is bad. I’m just saying one goes harder than the other, but I’m not denying that it sucks and that it clearly exists. I’m well aware of the patriot act and that speaking can endanger you. I just have this feeling like you get persecuted for speaking against the government in countries like China, whereas you need to be a strong figure to have the same fate in other countries. Anyways, it sucks for all countries that have this.

I have no data and this is just a feeling.

Democracy and freedom of speech, freedom to protest, freedom in general is in danger

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 day ago (5 children)

it only enabled its operators access to encrypted communications...

what the heck? isnt this much worse than simple microphone access?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 hours ago

They are also dirty grubby disgusting liars. They can turn on the microphone while it is off. While the whole phone is "off" which it never really is. That's why you can't buy a phone without a removavle battery.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 23 hours ago

"We only broke into your house and stole your shit, we didn't stab you in your sleep. You're welcome. "

[–] [email protected] 15 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Reminds me of when the NSA was spying on Yahoo Video calls so they could do their early facial recognition training.

Since it was a platform mostly used for video sex, The NSA literally made a public statement saying they had a system to blur genitals and that they were "only" training facial recognition data.

My mind was fucking blown. Who cares if you film my dick? That doesn't let you identity me from the MacDonald's cameras you hacked into. The face data is what we were worried about.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 23 hours ago

I think it means in the encrypted state. Still, bad.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago

Why does this not surprise me??

[–] [email protected] 7 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

They hack Italian (i assume they are italian citizens) working with migrants. If real Italians arent safe from the Spying State, just imagine how safe the Data of South-Tyroleans is, italians northest province!

[–] [email protected] -2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

this is not how Italy works...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

and who are you that you know this first hand? in italy? and even then you dont know as well as we do about the situation on the ground in south tyrol.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 hours ago

it seems I know it better than you though.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

there are also journalists between the people who were spied.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

Are Italians discriminatory toward South-Tyroleans? Do they consider them Austrian and not Italian or something? Don't know the lore.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 hours ago

There are Italians in South Tyrol, mostly in Meran and Bozen, which were given property and tax cuts by Mussolini to coloninse the Land. Many South Tyroleans were killed and their property stolen. The Italians still vote far right parties even after 80 years.

In Bozen you can still hear many say:"Speak italian, you are in Italy and South Tyrol is Italy."

which de jure its true, de facto not.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 hours ago

actually it's the opposite, or at least some of them don't consider themselves Italians.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

It kinda depends on how right wing you are afaik. There are German south tyroleans and Italian south tyroleans. I think the Italians were traditionally more left wing afaik. Tyroleans in general are weird as fuck and think they’re gods gift to humanity they will be dicks to other Austrians. There is is a tyrolean saying that if you’re not tyrolean you’re not human. Anyways Andreas Hofer is the man and reject vaccinations because they’re trying to infuse you with Bavarian ethics

If any one is tyrolean correct me if I’m wrong please

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This software is a fucking scourge on the world. We need to switch back to the original cell phones where only one person can use the tower at a time.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

The original cell phones were unencrypted and anyone nearby with a receiver could listen in on your call, no?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Thus no illusion of privacy.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

There was definitely an illusion.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 hours ago

At the time there indeed was. Similar to how sms is perceived today. But I think that anyone going back to older tech is going to be less ignorant about this today than someone adopting current technology, because hindsight is 20-20. We know the old stuff was insecure. But today’s tech is just tomorrow’s insecure tech.