this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2023
245 points (95.2% liked)

Technology

58151 readers
3675 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Return-to-office orders look like a way for rich, work-obsessed CEOs to grab power back from employees::White-collar workers temporarily enjoyed unprecedented power during the pandemic to decide where and how they worked.

all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 62 points 1 year ago (2 children)

These elite CEOs probably work 100-plus hours a week and they're much more work-focused.

Oh ffs. I have nothing against Nick Bloom but this statement is so BS. Even if "elite CEOs" could work 24 hours per day, 7 days per week their salaries could not be justified by any means. There are just not enough hours in a day to actually do it.

The mandates symbolize the sharp disconnect right now between the way CEOs and employees think about work.

He's right about that though.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

When I was an intern at a large company, the CIO talked to our small group of interns. He said he worked around that much, and I don't think he was lying. He told us about his typical day.

The company was located in a big city and he lived in the suburbs with a long commute by taxi and train. He would get up at 5AM to start the commute. He worked on the train and taxi. Then he would leave the office at 5PM, work on the commute home, have dinner and family time for 2 hours, then work until bed at around midnight. He said he was lucky he only needed 4 hours of sleep and how much he treasured the 2 hours he spent with his family every day. It was the only time he refused to take calls.

I think part of the problem why executives mistreate their workers so much is that they themselves are overworked and exhausted. Despite having a ton of money, they don't get to enjoy it, so it becomes meaningless.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And there's people out there who work just as much but will never make the same amount of money. When you have the privilege to never worry about cleaning, laundry, taking care of your kids, grocery shopping, cooking, and all the numerous bullshit things that just add up to consume your time that you can wave away when you were born rich allow you to do that. They don't consume your day and energy.

Not that everyone if suddenly given that kind of time would do what he does, but I don't think they should. I think he's the type of person who looking back on his deathbed will regret only spending 2 hours a day with his family. That's really sad.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

on his deathbed will regret only spending 2 hours a day with his family. That's really sad.

I don't know if you work and have kids, but honestly 2 hours of focused quality time with your kids is honestly amazing. I get 5 hours with my kid in the afternoon and that's because I'm privileged and I can pick her up exactly when she gets out of school. I still don't get to really hang out and just play with her those whole 5 hours because I still have to do things like cook and clean.

Sure on the weekends I manage more, but honestly 2 hours of just nothing but you and kid time is pretty normal for a working parent that isn't working insane hours. That guy will regret not going to recitals and stuff, but he won't be disconnected from his kids. I sure didn't get 2 hours a day during the week from my exhausted parents.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are you a rich CEO or were your parents? Probably not, your parents probably didn't have the privilege to not worry about all the things I listed. Which is why they got two hours a day with you because they were taking care of all the little things in life that just have to get done. So yeah, I agree, being a lower class working couple getting 2 hours a day is pretty good.

But imagine if your parents were working that much purely by choice not necessity. Not to make sure you had enough money to have the necessities of life, but to just have a bigger bank dick than the other guys. To have more power and status through money. Someone choosing to work insane hours to get $800,000 per year over $700,000 or whatever could afford to work much much less in exchange to spend way more time with their kids because they have that privilege.

My point is that CEO is squandering the privilege to spend more time with their family, a privilege that your parents didn't have.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I hear you, but I'm just saying that he probably won't have any regrets about his kid's childhood or literally everyone would. He's spending a typical amount of time with his kids.

Could he spent more? Yeah. Will he have regrets around his life? Yes. That man will die of a heart attack or exhaustion, but his children will know him. And worse still, they'll know that compared to most super rich parents, their dad paid them more mind than others in their peer group. Wealthy parents tend to offload their children onto others.

I get it. I have a kid and kids really eat into living your life even if you love them.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Some small number of people love being married to their work. And some of these people think since they enjoy it that others must feel the same, and when they see their employees quitting it's surprised Pikachu face and denial.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've worked as cook and sous chef for about 13 years now. Most I ever made was 55k a year and at that time I was working ~75 hours a week. If we extrapolate to 100 hours... Carry the one.... Yup! Still a far cry from the paycheck of a CEO.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

cook and sous chef

Mad respect from me. I can't think of a more difficult job, you have to keep up, you have to juggle orders were some things are easy and some things are hard, you have to deal with the temperature and the standing and the moving. This is a tough, tough job!

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago

It was never about productivity. It was always about control.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's also to make sure the commercial real estate market doesn't crash

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

no it isn't. the only people concerned about commercial real estate collapse is commercial real estate owners. CEOs care about their interests and power only.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

These dingles are gonna flex like this just before another Covid surge, I guess?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Managers are managers because they're good at playing power games, not because they're good at their jobs. These games are harder to play if people aren't there. That's why they're so scared.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Some managers are actually really good at resolving conflicts without bias and keeping the team functioning smoothly. In tech at least, people who make things aren't always that great at interacting with other people.

Of course, the kind of manager I'm talking about doesn't care how/when/where the work gets done, and they don't micro-manage.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

OK OK, I'm not saying all managers are like that. But I've certainly met a lot of them in my time.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

When I got my newest job the boss was bragging about I can work as much overtime as I want at 1.5x. like bitch I want undertime, let me work less!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Good, they'll be left with second rate wage slaves while other companies who trust their employees will be more productive and competitive as a result.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They don’t care. They need to lead/rule over/command people. Second rate or not.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So many don’t understand just how wildly inefficient bureaucratic hierarchies are; what happens isn’t the most profitable thing, it’s the whim of whoever managed to claw their way highest up.

Basically, the decisions are the manifestation of the artificial stupidity of brute force.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

How are the MBAs going to pull all their power poses if we work at home?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


"Because the labor market is looser and there's more talent to be hired, I think the employers think they'll be able to get their way," Dr Grace Lordan, associate professor in behavioral science at the London School of Economics told Insider.

A certain kind of CEO — noticeably skewing male and older, she said — is drawing from this "command and control" playbook as a way to rebuild an employee base that fits their idea of being productive and diligent.

"This belief of a certain cohort of people, and they are represented across all sectors, that presentee-ism is productivity, for them it's perfectly rational that if somebody doesn't want to come into the office then that basically means they're not somebody who wants to add value to the firm," Lordan added.

Elon Musk is consistently adamant about workers at his companies from X to Tesla being present in office, going as far as calling remote work "morally wrong."

A number of firms that benefited from a pandemic bump in business, particularly in tech, went on a hiring spree — triggering the "Great Resignation" as workers quit for ever-higher salaries and perks.

That attitude means certain types of employees will lose out — and return-to-office mandates will likely hurt diversity too if they are strictly enforced.


The original article contains 512 words, the summary contains 215 words. Saved 58%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

And by "look like" we mean "totally are"

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is terrible reporting, emotional, practically yellow. Two academics are quoted. The article and headline tell you how you should feel about this. This should have never gotten past the editor's desk.