this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2023
101 points (93.9% liked)

Technology

59374 readers
3714 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Apple’s cheaper Vision Pro follow-up still won’t be cheap::A new report says Apple’s next mixed-reality headset will likely ditch the external EyeSight screen to reach a cheaper price point, along with other hardware compromises.

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Even Apple's damn screen polishing cloth is not cheap - why would anyone hope for Apple branded ANYTHING to ever be cheap?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It may still be much more expensive than the competition, but will probably be half what the vision pro costs now.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

When Apple launches a new product line there are typically no real competitors. When the competition catches up, their prices suddenly line up with what Apple charges.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

"Apple Cheaper Vision" You almost had me on the first words.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In other news, the surface of the sun is hot.

Apple doesn't do 'cheap'. They charge A THOUSAND FUCKING DOLLARS for a damned monitor stand after selling you a $4-5000 dollar monitor that doesn't come with a stand!

If you are expecting to do anything in the Apple ecosystem 'cheap' you're going to be in for a bad time.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

The m2 MacBook airs are spectacular machines for the price.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

what is going tobe the objective of that vr-headset?, designing?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s meant to be a full workstation replacement. No longer need larger office spaces with multiple monitors because it can be simulated inside the headset, so imagine getting crammed under a stairwell and still having a big open space inside the headset to work. Dystopian universe here we come

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can you imagine your on your corporate network and now they not only know everything you do on your computer but also literally everything you look at? "Bill uses passthrough to look at his phone on average 18 times a day. Let's set up a meeting and restrict his passthrough privileges. He will live in our virtual corporate prison until further notice." The future is fun!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Thanks I hate it

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Mark Gurman writes in his Power On newsletter for Bloomberg today that the more affordable follow-up to the Apple Vision Pro will “likely” ditch the external display to help it reach an internally-discussed price point between $1,500 and $2.500.

Gurman also reiterates what he wrote in June — that the more affordable version will probably run on an iPhone-grade chip, have fewer cameras, and get lower-resolution screens inside.

Ditching the external display means Apple would lock one of the Vision Pro’s marquee features — EyeSight — behind the paywall of the more expensive versions.

EyeSight is the thing that lets you see an on-the-fly render of the wearer’s eyes so they can “look” at you when you’re talking to them, and so you can tell, at a glance, if they’re occupied or if they’re actually seeing what’s in front of them.

Gurman writes that in deciding to prioritize getting a friendlier-priced version out into the world, Apple shifted people to that and away from its technically-challenging AR glasses project.

Especially if the company has any hopes about drawing in people who haven’t yet decided if they want this sort of thing in their life — a challenge that’s far from unique to Apple.


The original article contains 245 words, the summary contains 203 words. Saved 17%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Lower resolution screens would kill half of their advertised use cases.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Apple : What does cheap mean?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's fine, they could give it away for free and I still wouldn't want it.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because I'm not in the Apple ecosystem and I'm not about to start now.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I sort of am, but I don't see the point of the Vision Pro, or any such AR headsets honestly. Like VR to me is a gimmick, AR is a step under that.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

That's because it's still an early's adopters tech. There is absolutely a ton of potential in this space.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

VR is absolutely incredible to me. That said, I have an Index that’s been played ten times in the last two years. It’s just a lot of effort to set up when I wanna play, and my ass is lazy.