this post was submitted on 08 May 2025
605 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

69846 readers
5341 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Tesla has confirmed it has given up on plans to make a Cybertruck range extender to achieve the range it originally promised on the electric pickup truck.

It started refunding deposits for the $16,000 extra battery pack.

When Tesla unveiled the production version of the Cybertruck in late 2023, two main disappointments were the price and the range.

The tri-motor version, the most popular in reservation tallies before production, was supposed to have over 500 miles of range and start at $70,000.

Tesla now sells the tri-motor Cybertruck for $100,000 and only has a range of 320 miles.

The dual-motor Cybertruck was supposed to cost $50,000 and have over 300 miles of range. In reality, it starts at $80,000 and has 325 miles of range.

Archive link: https://archive.is/CGbaE

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 40 minutes ago

It could be $15 and have the range of an ICBM, it can still sit on the lot and scare the kids walking by.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (7 children)

Is it just me, or is musk profiting off of selling people tech before it's actually ready?

Like, we don't have the means right now to achieve what he advertises, so he lies about it and then 'alters the deal' after taking people's money.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 minutes ago

selling half-assed tech, basically A scam, which is whole business model.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 hour ago

Only a fool buys something on the promise of future upgrades and potential. Buy stuff on what it is now.

This is a bad look for Tesla for sure, but no one should be going “I wouldn’t have bought it if I knew this would get cancelled”.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 49 minutes ago

So he learned from the video gaming industry?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 hour ago

Pray I don't alter it further.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 hours ago

that's been tech as an industry for the last decade. product releases, then all promised features come as a half baked update a year later... if at all. phones, games, cars, etc all use this strategy now unfortunately.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago

Is it just me, or is musk profiting off of selling people tech before it's actually ready?

Today's vocab word is Vaporware

[–] [email protected] 18 points 7 hours ago

That's exactly what he's been doing with all his businesses. And it works. Tesla is still hugely overvalued as a company.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

How about giving up on the Cybertruck

[–] [email protected] 26 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

Why the switch to a black hat? Was it to easy for people to see?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 hours ago

Why implement a new feature for a product nobody is buying?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

How hard can it be to produce a simple battery pack, for a company that is in the business of designing and producing battery packs no less...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

Preorder interest probably made it not worth it financially.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Think the end of the article pretty much nails it.

Tesla needed to install and remove it at a service center. Owners couldn’t remove them themselves. I think it was pretty much dead on arrival at $16,000.

But I think it could also be as simple as it’s not worth producing due to demand – both due to insufficient people reserving it and not enough Cybertruck buyers to create a market for the range extender.

Therefore, the range extender is dead for the same reason that the Cybertruck RWD now has the same battery pack as the AWD instead of a smaller pack for less money: the Cybertruck is a commercial flop, and it’s not a high-volume program enough to justify making several battery pack sizes, including a removable one.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

I see he took the "Game as a Service" approach but with electric trucks.

Nice.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 16 hours ago (12 children)

Ima be honest, I like the design of this thing. I’m big into brutalism and the Delorean is one of my favorite car designs of all time. I was really hoping this would be good, but it has turned out to be one of the worst products in recent history in any category. It’s up there with the humane pin.

It makes me a little bit sad because I will never be able to live out my cyberpunk fantasy of driving an electric truck made out of bare metal manufactured by a technofascist corporation.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

What are you basing that extreme statement on? It seems to far from a bad product, let alone “one of the worst products in recent history”.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 22 minutes ago

A 100k "rugged offroad" vehicle where the bumper falls off when you tow something, that isn't waterproof, sometimes the rims just break, it can slice you apart and the car is held together by elmers glue and hopes and dreams. What other product in that price range is that shit?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 hours ago

I absolutely hated the design and feel bad for anyone who gets into an accident with this monstrosity.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 12 hours ago

up there with the humane pin.

Funny, or sad, how quickly we collective manage to forget bad grifts.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

Why the third motor? One for each of the front wheels and one for the rear?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 minutes ago

the 3rd one is a reality disortion field motor for MUSKRATS musk supporters.

[–] [email protected] 57 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

One runs front wheels, one runs rear wheels and third one powers the mental gymnastics it takes to be a tesla owner in 2025.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 13 points 14 hours ago (15 children)

Two in the back, one in the front. There's also a two and four motor version.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 hours ago

Two in the back, one in the front.

The Shocker

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] [email protected] 80 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (10 children)

The dual motor was originally announced to be US$39,900, not 50,000. It is lies all the way down at Tesla.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 150 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (7 children)

"Thanks for all the $16k loans at 0% shmucks. We've kept the interest we made while rates have been up and now you can have it back while they're dropping. Of course, your money is now worth less than it was when you gave it to us during high inflation. Suck it losers. Love, T E S L A"

EDIT: deposit was $150. Still shitty but not the same impact

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›