Well of course they did. I'm sure at Musk's direction as well. Probably not the only one either.
this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2023
395 points (95.0% liked)
Technology
59312 readers
5268 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I can't imagine the punishment they hand down will be anywhere close to the money Musk feels like he's saved by committing the act and stopping others from doing things he doesn't want them to do
And that's the problem
"Return to work". Motherfuckers, they were already employed. 🙄 I bet CNBC is one of the companies that had a controversial RTO policy. I utterly resent these attempts at trying to normalize deceptive language for return to office schemes subconsciously, like people that don't want to return to office aren't working somehow and it's somehow their fault it's a problem, and not the fault of an inflexible employer.
I thought that headline sounded a little off. Corporate bootlicking bastards.
Yue then tweeted, "Don't resign, let him fire you. You gain literally nothing out of resignation." She also posted in a company Slack channel a message saying, "Don't be fired. Seriously."
Don't resign or don't be fired? I think she meant don't resign.
That’s retaliation right? They should add one more suit to the already long list of things Twitter is being sued for.