this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2025
9 points (90.9% liked)

UK Politics

3649 readers
317 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both [email protected] and [email protected] .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

[email protected] appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago

gee if only you were still part of the largest trading bloc in europe

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Is this going to be like that time Neville Chamberlain flew to Berlin and got an agreement from Hitler that he wouldn't invade Poland?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Well so far fuck nuts hasn’t used military force against his neighbours. Talked about it but hasn’t. Putin on the other hand is a real hitler. Appeasement won’t work with him.

On a side note regarding chamberlain. He realized Britain wasn’t ready to fight Germany. They needed to rearm. Those few years allowed them to build a few thousand modern ighters which paid off durning the Battle of Britain. No appeasement and no spitfires.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

On a side note regarding chamberlain

That's a revisionist view, unspported by evidence in his contemporaries' diaries, notes and official documents. What there is evidence of, though, is a number of people, many in his own party, observing that Chamberlain was naive and out of his depth. His main political experience prior to being PM was in Birmingham local politics. He was a schmoozer who prided himself on his dealmaking. He had no idea what he was doing when it came to international politics, and his party had a large pro-Nazi faction. He was also digustingly cynical about his sell-out of Czechoslovakia: "A far-away country of which we no little."

Churchill was not popular with the Conservatives, but he was no ditherer.