this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2025
62 points (93.1% liked)

Technology

69158 readers
3040 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 27 points 19 hours ago

✅ I have not said mean things about Erdoğan

[–] [email protected] 17 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

So they're centralizing their 'federated' social media even more.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 hours ago

Sort of. This is apparently done on-protocol so anyone can issue verifications, but they're only shown in the official client if they're from BlueSky or someone approved by BlueSky.

A better way to do this would be to let users subscribe to verifiers the way they can labelers. Better still would be for the label to indicate what the verifier has verified about the account, like "nytimes.com says this person is an employee of the New York Times", which is something labelers can already do.

So I really think they should have just leaned into labelers.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

Probably but they’ve designated others to do it. Like a trusted organization (Wired or The NY Times) can verify people. Some of the developers seemed hostile.

But who gives a fuck about a blue check anyway? Even before Elon, it was a gag on Twitter when some fucking moron who interned at Reason or some shit got a big head about it and wrote as a clown to be laughed at. “Some personal news, I’m now the assistant associate dipshit at the newspaper they try to give you for free when you get on the subway.”

[–] [email protected] 3 points 17 hours ago

I don’t want to know who any of you people are. None of us saw anything. And if so much as a squirrel asks, I’m asking for a lawyer.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

it's decentralized somewhat. they're allowing trusted organizations to give verification

[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

...Until they suddenly don't anymore

[–] [email protected] 1 points 12 hours ago

why would they care about this it's not a monetized feature

[–] [email protected] 7 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

I don't understand why they don't just use the domain verification which is far more authoritative

[–] [email protected] 11 points 18 hours ago

They do.

Probably should give it a clearer visual cue now that they do blue ticks, but it's there.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 17 hours ago

They do. That said, now that it’s really easy to mask whois data, I would argue that’s a less than perfect solution.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 12 hours ago

Pretty pointless.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 16 hours ago

They'll make it paid someday. Trust me guys.