this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2025
79 points (96.5% liked)

xkcd

10976 readers
18 users here now

A community for a webcomic of romance, sarcasm, math, and language.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Our anti-de Sitter club is small at the moment, but I've started corresponding with the conformal field theory people.

https://explainxkcd.com/3077/

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I love reading about physics things that I just can’t conceptualize. Spaces with more or fewer than 360 degrees of rotation? Cool, I absolutely can’t imagine it

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Try drawing a triangle on a globe and measure the angles, it will be more than 180 degrees. That's probably the simplest visualisation possible.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Look at you, making it all easy to understand

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Spheres are examples of surfaces with positive curvature. Negative curvature (where the angles of a triangle add up to less than 180 degrees) is represented by this saddle shape:

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

If you draw a triangle on different parts of a toroid, would you get different angles?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Yup! That saddle is a shape of constant negative curvature. On a toroid, the inside of the hole would have negative curvature and the outside would have positive curvature.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Wow. That would be truly bizarre kind of space to live in.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Same is true for a sphere. For example, if you draw a triangle with 1 vertex at the north pole and the other two on the equator, all the angles are 90 degrees. But if you move, say, the north pole vertex to be closer to the two in the equator, then you'd get a smaller sum.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Hmm… that’s a good point. Basically anything other than a flat surface will have these bizarre properties.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago

You made an enemy out of a sitter today. You've turned Willem de Sitter into Willem Dafoe.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

There really is an xkcd for everything.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Yep. Here you go. Cause I sure as fuck didn't understand this one... https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/3077:_de_Sitter