656
Ironically having a giant security breach happen in a security focused messaging app was good advertising.
Of course in this instance the breach was not because of the app, which is a good thing I guess.
this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2025
656 points (99.5% liked)
Technology
68245 readers
6629 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
"When something is made idiot-proof, they will just make better idiots."
Gestures broadly at the federal government
Gestures narrowly at oval office and cabinet.
It's not a security breach per se. Someone accidentally added a journalist to the group. Signal is still as safe as it's ever been.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(7 replies)
Good. It's the only encrypted channel I trust right now.
I'd consider using them if I didn't need to use a phone number to register. My friends and family stick with Briar as a result.
Hey man, if you can convince anyone to use Briar, do that. I have better luck getting people to use Signal because it's way more popular and easier to sign up. And if I want to know if someone uses it, I can find out instantly.
Convenience vs security
Yes and no, Signal is more convenient but convenience doesn't play into a scenario where I have no way to message someone on a given platform. And most people aren't interested in a conversation about which messengers they're using.
load more comments
(5 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(6 replies)
So who exactly is downloading the app as a result of this latest government scandal? I'm going to guess it's the maga crowd because they are this as an endorsement from their new king. But hopefully I'm wrong and it's a broad sweep of different users from across the political spectrum.
load more comments
(10 replies)
It just about always comes down to user error. The White House trusting Signal is very indicative of the effectiveness of the app's underlying protocols and the organization's commitment to privacy. This is definitely huge publicity and I hope Signal endures the limelight.
LOL what kinda bullshit comment is this?
The people in the White House are idiots. They choose Signal because they're either dumb/negligent -or- because they have been intentionally avoiding record preservation requirements.
Signal is a solid app for sure, but these dipshits didn't choose it for being the right tool for the job here, as it certainly is not.
I wholeheartedly agree the White House is full of morons. I was just saying that Signal is a solid app for me to securely share bullshit with my family. Its definitely not the right tool for government officials to use. But its plenty safe for sharing memes and pics of my dog.
-or- because they have been intentionally avoiding record preservation requirements.
It's this one
dipshits didn't choose it for being the right tool for the job here, as it certainly is not.
It was, actually. If they weren't dipshits it wouldn't have been a problem.
Signal, on your personal device, is fine for personal use. It is absolutely not fine for classified communication as the VP or head of DoD, as there are billions of dollars dedicated to compromising your phone.
The encryption doesn’t mean shit if they breach an endpoint or account.
If it was strictly personal chat, yeah, no problem, but they just have to assume the messages are being read by other nations.
load more comments
(3 replies)
It's not the right tool for their job but still a good tool for the laws they were trying to break...
load more comments
(4 replies)