this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2025
790 points (98.5% liked)

Memes

49446 readers
1807 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You've got to entangle the same machine first over a massive macro quantum space-time superposition.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

See, you get it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

One way to resolve this is to have some kind of multiverse theory where you don't travel back in time to your universe, but to a narrow slection of parallel universes that are also shifted slightly so that it spits you out in an analogous location to your initial departure.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

I always wondered about this

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Same place relative to what?

It's space-time, not space and time. Moving backwards in one moves you backwards in the other.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

This is not how general relativity works at all. If your coordinates are set to a spot on Earth (or some spot relative to Earth), you will appear at that same point. Spacetime exhibits something called diffeomorphism covariance which is a fancy way of saying you'd have to go out of your way in the dumbest way possible to get this outcome.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›