this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2025
307 points (94.2% liked)

Fediverse

30688 readers
872 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to [email protected]!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

An important step toward a more interoperable “fediverse” — the broader network of decentralized social media apps like Mastodon, Bluesky and others — has been achieved. Now users on decentralized apps like Mastodon, powered by the ActivityPub protocol, and those powered by Bluesky’s AT Protocol, can easily follow people on other networks, see their posts, and like, reply and repost them.

Those same people will be able to see the others’ posts in return, too.

The technology making this possible is Bridgy Fed, one of the efforts aimed at connecting the fediverse with the web, Bluesky and, perhaps later, other networks like Nostr.

Since the 2022 sale of Twitter to Elon Musk, who rebranded the app X, there’s been a surge of interest in decentralized social media. Apps like Mastodon gained a following in the wake of Twitter’s new ownership, as users explored what a network without a centralized authority may look like. Meanwhile, Bluesky — a startup originally incubated within Twitter — raised a seed round and grew its network to over 5.7 million users after launching publicly earlier this year.

Other decentralized social media networks are finding footing of their own, too, like the blockchain-based Farcaster, which just last month closed on $150 million in funding from Paradigm, a16z crypto, Haun Ventures, USV and others.

There’s just one problem these networks face in gaining traction against a rival like X or Meta’s Threads: Their users couldn’t talk to each other.

Though both Mastodon and Bluesky are decentralized social media efforts, they rely on different underlying protocols. That means a Mastodon user can interact with others who post elsewhere on the fediverse — that is, other apps that use the older ActivityPub social networking protocol. But they couldn’t interact with people who posted on Bluesky, because it uses the newer AT Protocol to operate.

Software developer Ryan Barrett has been working to address this problem with Bridgy Fed, a social networking bridge that would connect fediverse users to those on Bluesky and vice versa.

top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 21 hours ago

those powered by Bluesky’s AT Protocol

Like what? Which platforms are those Sarah Perez writing for TechCrunch? Can you name more than one?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 21 hours ago

If only bluesky supported activity pub. It would be useful as trying to get people to follow it even though its a 2 click process is only challenge. Especially when it's to someone who not technologically minded.

[–] [email protected] 91 points 1 day ago (2 children)

FYI this article is from June 2024

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 day ago

This is what I was thinking. when I read the headline I was like I've already been doing this since 9 months!

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

I thought for a second if they had finally made Bluesky opt-out. Sadly it looks like we'll have to wait a bit longer for that. :)

[–] [email protected] 57 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just FYI, this is an old article.

There is some interesting tools that have come out because of this:

From my experience, its been very hard to find people that use the bridge both from bluesky and mastodon. But it does work. Im still looking for a browser extension that makes the process of following a bluesky account from mastodon easier. Its not very user friendly ATM.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It was new to me, and hadn't seen it posted here - sorry if the language in the headline is misleading. Thanks for the links! I just started researching this after working with some Wordpress -> ActivityPub plugins and was curious if the functionality could extend to BlueSky.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Its all good! Lemmy isnt going to downvote you to hell for repeating something a year old. We are not reddit ;)

How does the wordpress integration work? I haven't seen much articles talking about it lately. Can I post from mastodon to a wordpress?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

We are not reddit

That's why I'm here ;)

Here's an article on the integration that goes into decent detail. And here's the git repo, but you should be able to see via your plugin interface. The developer is very responsive and a great guy.

What I've found is that it does enable crossposting, and is a good tool for publishing your content out. Comments do come in if enabled. Subscribing to offsite Mastodon users is very "interesting" however - like being able to see people's DMs if they're across servers. There's also issues with using it with cheaper hosts (Bluehost, I'm looking at you), as certain security settings will disable part or all of the feed.

To me, it feels good to use if your WP has one user publishing content. If you have other users on the site, it could start getting messy on the backend. Incoming spam is also an issue - Jetpack isn't set up to scan incoming Fediverse content.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

One can post from WordPress to ActivityPub, which could lead to blog posts ending up in Mastodon feeds. Mastodon users can then share, like, and comment.

You cannot, however, make blog posts to WordPress using ActivityPub. It's for distribution only, like an interactive RSS feed.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

As a computer engineering student who has just got into this whole fediverse thing recently I find the concept of decentralised social media to be pretty mesmerizing. I didn't think people would actually seek the ability to cross-communicate too.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

In my defense, your honor, I too was misled by the headline, and coupled with my own ignorance, truly thought this was shiny and new.

I throw myself upon the mercy of the court.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 13 hours ago

This was posted to explain that you require no defense.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

Your ignorance means it was shiny and new to you, and that's okay!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

The problem with bridgy fed is everybody needs to opt in. Even if you respond to a syndicated post from AP on Bluesky, but you're not following their account to opt in, it doesn't show up.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

Thankfully, I've already blocked Bluesky from my Mastodon feed. :D

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

I use Wafrn and I don't know how exactly the devs did it, but wafrn gives you the ability to enable a bluesky account and interact with people there without being in the official server. I particularly don't have it enabled because I don't care for it, it's basically twitter 2.0 and I hated twitter. So I have no intention to engage in or with a place that's basically ""decentralised" twitter", but it's there and it's opt-in.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Not interested. The folks on Blue sky can keep their corporate social media.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I’m only speaking for myself but I’m not sure I’d want my BlueSky and Mastodon feeds mixing. I tried it with Skybridge and a third party Mastodon app and the vibe shift felt weird. I’m all for people making bridges for those who want it but I don’t mind having two apps that I use to follow two different cultures.

On Mastodon, I followed a lot of developers and activists and it’s usually kind of serious discussions. On BlueSky, I followed shitposters and people who don’t take posting too seriously. Twitter refugees. People like that. And that works great for me. Sometimes, I want one and sometimes I want the other.

Back in the olden days when Twitter wasn’t fash, I made lists and that worked fine. Like, I had a list for activists, a list for weather alerts, local government announcements, etc. My main feed was for people making jokes. So, it can be one app. But I’ll be ok if it’s two apps. (It’d be nice to have a Tweetdeck thing — there’s blue.deck and Mastodon equivalents — that can view it all, especially during major events.)

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Personally, I think a sweet spot would be to ask users when they sign up what kind of experience they want. Let them decide and make it easy to change later.

"Do you want your posts to be followed by Mastodon/Fediverse?" Yes/No/I dunno (No/I dunno are the same with a bit more info). Something like that. Then if they have it on, have a button like mastodon that makes it easy to follow outside the network.

The current way of having both accounts follow a certain account is difficult enough that most dont do it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Well, the current way is a third party "unofficial" solution

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

I wonder if you could do it like the aggregation apps that used to exist for like...FB, Twitter, Instagram, where you can access/post from multiple accounts. My big thing is I hate having a dozen apps that do the same thing; so having an aggregator app is nice. For people who want the singular account, you could see both Bsky and Mastodon. For people like yourself, you could log in to both accounts and have separate feeds, just homed on the same app. And I imagine it'd be nicer, because Activity Pub would be the base, and it could display different UIs based on what information is being pulled, so it isn't just like a Twitter feed on FB. You could get the Lemmy view on Lemmy, Twitter view on Bsky/Mastodon, Instagram on PixelFed, etc.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Since mastodon can interact with us, does that mean bluesky can too?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I haven't investigated / tested it yet, but it should be possible. The thing is that Lemmy and Mastodon use different parts of the ActivityPub protocol to publish content, which is why interaction between the two is "interesting". My guess is that you'll be able to post and reply to comments and DMs, but it may be difficult to create posts in communities.

Side note, Mbin combines the Mastodon/Lemmy interpretation of ActivityPub protocols pretty well, so it's possible, but when I last used it was still pretty fragile, and had stability issues. When the project was kbin, it had a real problem during the CSAM attacks on the Fediverse about two years ago, which led to the biggest instances being defederated and the founder eventually having to abandon the project.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)
  1. Bridged Mbin user posts micro blog to community
  2. Bridged Bluesky user comments on Bluesky copy of post
  3. Profit?

It could work. If anyone on Bluesky wants to give it a shot I can make a post to some testing community - my profile is bridged. Not very interestingly so though, as I don't post microblogs often.

Edit: I just made this post in Mbin, seen here in dbzer0's Dylan community, and here on Bluesky. Spreading it everywhere certainly worked, if a bridged user wants to respond they can share their emotions after listening to this. ;)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Heck yeah I'll give you a follow over on Bluesky. I'm following a handful of people that are bridged Mastodon users. Yours will be the first Mbin one though. I really hope all the kinks get worked out over time though because I really love the idea of interconnectivity.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

Kinda, right now its opt in, and to opt in you have to follow @[email protected] or @ap.brid.gy on bsky.

Lemmy has no functionality to follow users yet.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I can't seem to find any information on it, but how hard would if be to host your own Bridgy Fed? I feel a tool like this would ideally be decentralized.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

I believe the tool itself is open source, so it's definitely a possibility.

github

It looks to be python? Can't see a guide on how to host it, though