I don't get how something is allowed to be labeled "free" when the terms of usage make you barter your data.
this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2025
1277 points (98.3% liked)
Technology
63547 readers
2681 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
This is why I am an advocate for publicly-funded Internet, like how people fund NPR and BBC.
I don't blame Firefox because at the end of the day, they are still a business and need to cover the operating cost. I blame the system that we're in and the elites will tell you there is no other alternative.
load more comments
(6 replies)
I haven't been presented with any Ts and C's. Do they apply if I already installed Firefox before this?
I remember a time when Google wrote "Don't be evil" all over their stuff.....
load more comments
(2 replies)
I'm about to get my tattoo removed wtf
Just get "RIP" tattooed under it.
load more comments
(2 replies)
They can't just promise they "never will" and then get rid of it. People who used the service under the original agreement should still be able to claim that benefit since it was promising to never sell it.
I use brave and librewolf, anybody know if those are still safe from this dort of thing? (Probably not I guess, so what browsers are left?)
Librewolf is privacy-hardened so it's probably the best option. Brave is Chromium-based. Realistically though, all web browsers come with compromises, and internet anonymity is virtually impossible without unrealistic amounts of effort.
Someone earlier said that brave was based on chrome and when google blocked ublock origin on Chrome, it would stop working on brave too.
People don't like Brave because they believe it's a crypto scam, and the CEO is a douchebag. But Brave has said they'll continue to support extensions regardless of Google's change.
Don't forget the CEO's worst crime: he's the inventor of javascript
Clearly not someone you can trust.
load more comments
(4 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(3 replies)
Since we strive for transparency, and the LEGAL definition of “sale of data” is extremely broad in some places, we’ve had to step back from making the definitive statements you know and love. We still put a lot of work into making sure that the data that we share with our partners (which we need to do to make Firefox commercially viable)
So in other words we sell your data and get paid for it, and some countries won't let us lie about it.
load more comments
(2 replies)
I mean you could argue that them defaulting to Google search is already them selling your data. Google definitely pay them for that.
load more comments
(3 replies)
That clarification is not making me calm
So sad. I have used Firefox since 2006. Today I removed it for good from all of my devices. So long old friend. I cant wait for Ladybird to release.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Mozilla is trying to increase their revenue by doing everything other than improving Firefox
load more comments
(4 replies)
~~Don’t~~ be evil
Gahhhh this is horrible
I spent some time switching to Librewolf this morning but at the end of the day, it having Firefox as the upstream means it’s all fragile and tenuous anyway
load more comments
(12 replies)