Facebook was leeching? No way...
this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2025
328 points (99.7% liked)
Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ
57305 readers
301 users here now
⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.
Rules • Full Version
1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy
2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote
3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs
4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others
Loot, Pillage, & Plunder
📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):
🏴☠️ Other communities
Torrenting:
Gaming:
💰 Please help cover server costs.
 |
 |
|---|---|
| Ko-fi | Liberapay |
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Somehow that makes it even worse in my opinion
dirty hit and run behavior, motherf****ers
This.
Death penalty for leechers.
So they're inconsiderate assholes and leeches.
Now now, they're not just inconsiderate assholes and leeches.
They're inconsiderate nazi oligarch assholes and leeches.
Hey now, they aren't Nazis. Nazis at least believe in something, even if it's something terrible.
We didn't inhale, so it's not illegal for us. ~ZuckFuck
thats like the only thing that would've made this better bro
I was actually hoping to see that as a defense. The principal thing that copy enforcement corps always cite is 'we downloaded a copy from their IP, thus they made a copy and distributed the work'.
If this works as a defense here then in effect they make direct download portals legal for the users at least.
You’re forgetting that they’re a rich corporation, and you’re not. They’ll get away with the defense, but even if it set a precedent, copyright groups can still sue you until you’re broke to make an example of you, even if you didn’t legally do anything “wrong”.
As long as you can sue someone for any reason without repercussions, then it’s always going to be the people with more money who come out on top. Always. Wining a lawsuit doesn’t mean you’re not still financially destroyed and driven into poverty for the rest of your life.
Has anyone in the US ever been busted for downloading from a direct download portal? Or usenet?
I think any progress here is mostly in principle, as I don't think there's a big practical risk to downloading only as it stands today, though I don't follow things as closely as I used to and could be mistaken.
Has anyone in the US ever been busted for downloading from a direct download portal?
Nobody in the US has ever been busted on copyright grounds for downloading anything, regardless of source. The law does not provide for enforcement against downloading; only uploading.
No, but even a baseless civil suit costs a lot of time and money to fight.
load more comments
(2 replies)
this is actually the way it works in australia: downloading content is not illegal; sharing content is illegal
thus as a consumer, usenet is fine
obligatory ianal
I doubt anything legal would come from this, but it does progress the conversation about piracy:
“You wouldn’t download a car would you? Cause zuck would without sharing”
Where now are the copyright trolls that sued regular students for millions of dollars for downloading 30 songs?
Under federal law, the recording companies were entitled to $750 to $30,000 per infringement. But the law allows as much as $150,000 per track if the jury finds the infringements were willful.
Let me see:
- At least 100 million of books pirated
- infringements were willful
So, a 15k billion dollars fine seem appropriate to give to Meta AND criminal sentences to all the c suite.
Or: apply the same rules to regular people and allow unlimited copyright violations without consequences
Joel Tenenbaum, of Providence, admitted in court that he downloaded and distributed 30 songs.
Your example is exactly why meta didn't seed.
It's a weak defense because the clients still exchanged metadata with other clients, plus there's the big issue of using the copyrighted works for their own profit, and not just archiving/preservation/personal use
It's a solid defense, since the lawsuit's about the sharing of the books. The metadata of the torrents isn't part of the relevant IP, and how they used the content they downloaded is a separate issue.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Yes your honor I lit up but didn't inhale.
More like "Yes your honor I lit up and inhaled, just got a huge ass lungful, but I didn't pass"
makes me think of the loopholes christian teenagers come up with to claim they're totally not having premarital sex.
the company clarifies that there is nothing 'independently illegal' about torrenting.
Ah yes, I'm sure this strawman defense will hold up well for them in court.
It will probably work. Because, you know, money.
If it does work, does that then mean they've effectively declared torrenting to be legal? Or at least as long as you claim not to have seeded?
You hope! Laws will still apply to us peasants
Bastard leachers.
ah so they only downloaded them illigally, and then used them illegally, but didn't share them illegally. got it
~~Sharing is caring~~
Sharing is crime(͡•_ ͡• )
load more comments
(55 replies)
Is there a way to change the torrent client's name\version so you appear in a list of seeds as Mark Zuckerberg?
Certainly, but it's not like that'll get him in trouble or anything
It'd certainly encourage me to up my torrenting game so this shit appears 24\7 at rather weird uploads around the globe.
not really what we upset about but okay
Overthrow democratic nations 👍 Theoretically the owning class loosing out on a few bucks 😱
Thanks Meta.
Haha, what a bunch of scumbags. They can"t even seed back when pirating.
We really need to round up all of Meta's executive directors, seize all their assets (every last cent) and require them to do mandatory two decade live-in community service as junior custodians (the lowest level custodians in the whole institution) at hospice centres or infectious disease hospitals. De-mining work and resource extraction junior support would also be good options for community service work.
Not for this of course, more like knowingly enabling genocide in Myanmar and so on.
I know it’s their legal defense and all, but it’s not like any of us thought they would seed in the first place. Their business is only about taking for profit, not sharing or giving anything back.
load more comments
(1 replies)
view more: next ›